1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
4 years ago
12

Please tell me all steps to solve this problem (Attachment below)

Mathematics
2 answers:
lora16 [44]4 years ago
6 0
<h3>Answer:</h3>
  • Vertices of the feasible region: (5, 0), (1.5, 3.5), (0, 3), (0, 0)
  • Maximum value of C: 30, at (x, y) = (5, 0).
<h3>Step-by-step explanation:</h3>

1. Plot the constraints. (See the attached)

2. Find the region of overlap. This is the solution space, or "feasible region." (In the attached, this is the purple region where the red and blue regions overlap.)

3. Identify the corners of the feasible region. These are the points where the boundary lines of the feasible region intersect. (They are the vertices listed above.)

4. Evaluate the objective function at each of the corners of the feasible region to determine which maximizes the function. (See comment below.) For (x, y) = (5, 0), C = 6·5 -4·0 = 30.

_____

<em>Comment on maximizing the objective function</em>

This objective function has a positive coefficient (+6) for x and a negative coefficient (-4) for y. In order to maximize it, x must be made as large as possible at the same time y is made as small as possible. This means you will be seeking values of x and y that are as far as possible to the lower right of the feasible region. In this problem, the vertex (x, y) = (5, 0) matches that description. This analysis makes it unnecessary to evaluate C for other corners of the feasible region (unless you just want to).

For an objective function with both coefficients positive, I find it convenient to plot the objective function with C=0. This can help you find the vertex of the feasible region that will move the objective function line farthest from the origin.

Some problems are such that the variable values must be integers. In such cases it may take a little searching to find the precise set of integers that maximizes the objective function. That solution may or may not be near one of the vertices of the feasible region.

nevsk [136]4 years ago
3 0

I wrote your answer....

You might be interested in
John is 3 years older than Jim. Jim is 4 years less than twice David’s age. How old are the three boys if their ages add up to 3
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

15  years , 12  years , 8 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

John is 3 years older than Jim.

Jim is 4 years less than twice David’s age.

Ages of three boys add up to 35.

Question asked:

How old are the three boys?

Solution:

Let age of David = y

Let age of Jim = x

Then age of John will be = x + 3

As Jim is 4 years less than twice David’s age

Equation will be  , x = 2y - 4

Multiplying both side  by 2

                       = 2x = 4y - 8  (let equation 1 )

As ages of three boys add up to 35.

Equation will be,x + (x + 3) + y = 35

                           = 2x + 3 + y = 35

Subtracting both side by 3

                           =   2x + y = 32

                          = 2x = - y + 32  (let equation 2 )

subtracting equation 1 and 2,we get

                           =  2x = - y + 32

                          =   2x = 4y - 8

                          =  0 = - 5y + 40

                          = 5y = 40

dividing both side by 5

                              = y = 8 (David ages)

Then  ( age of Jim)  x = 2y - 4

                                 x = 2 \times8 - 4

                                    = 16 - 4

                                    = 12 years

Then age of John will be, x + 3

                                            = 12 + 3

                                            = 15 years

Thus, age of John = 15 years

Age of Jim = 12 years

Age of David = 8 years

7 0
3 years ago
Geomentry (7x) x over 2
Arte-miy333 [17]
Simplifying
-1x + -7 = 5x + -11 + -7x
Reorder the terms
-7 + -1x = 5x + -11 + -7x
Reorder the terms
-7 + -1x = -11 + 5x + -7x
Combine like terms
5x + -7x = -2x
-7 + -1x = -11 + -2x
Solving
-7 + -1x = -11 + -2x
6 0
3 years ago
Based on this graph, which statement MUST be true?
adell [148]
Statements A and C are true
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A car
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

d=28g I might be wrong, but we can find this by dividing 140 by five, which equals 28

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
2 divided by 1/4 HELP ME PLSSS
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

First:

Convert any mixed numbers to fractions.

Then your initial equation becomes:

21÷14

Applying the fractions formula for division,

=2×41×1

=81

Simplifying 8/1, the answer is

=8

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pls help! which of the following equations is written in standard form ?
    7·1 answer
  • The Perimeter of a rectangle is 36. If there's 5n + 3 and 1/4n + 2, what's the value of n?
    7·1 answer
  • !!!!Pls help me hurry !!!! I don’t know what I’m doing
    11·1 answer
  • Please Help!
    15·1 answer
  • A scale drawing of a building shows 1 inch=8 feet. How many feet are represented by 3 3/4 inches on the drawing
    13·1 answer
  • Substitution <br> -x +y=-5<br><br> 3x-5y=9
    15·1 answer
  • Tess and Dan have $24.00 each to spend at a book fair, where all students receive a 15% discount. They both want to purchase a c
    6·1 answer
  • The co-ordinates of points (0,-5)&amp;(3,-1) respectively .Find<br>Vector AB<br>Magnitude AB ​
    13·1 answer
  • Jose earned 50 points in a video game. He lost 45 points, earned 90 points, then lost 35 more points. Enter and evaluate an expr
    6·1 answer
  • 3 over 8 multiplied by 10 over 9 multiplied by 16
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!