1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fredd [130]
3 years ago
13

Explain how the US federal system of checks and balances ideally prevents a “tyranny of the majority”?

History
1 answer:
NARA [144]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I will cite Steve Farrell on this.

"Our Constitution embodies the principle of checks and balances. Separate are legislative, executive and judicial powers. Separate are the two branches of the legislature as well – each power, each branch, possessing checks and balances upon neighbouring powers and branches.

Further, there is the federal principle, wherein all the powers not delegated specifically to the national government belong to the states or the people. (5)

The Bill of Rights provides yet another check, while the constitutional mandate that the states guarantee a republican form of government to their people (6) helps insure that government on the state level is similarly checked and balanced, and that city and county governments play a vital role..."

You might be interested in
What was one of the organizations that Fannie Lou Hamer helped start?
Anestetic [448]
Student nonviolent coordinating committee or SNCC
8 0
3 years ago
Name two organizations that fought to promote the cause of latinos.
Mice21 [21]
UFWOC- United Farm Workers Organization Comitee

LULAC-  <span>League of United Latin American Citizens</span>
8 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
dlinn [17]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Peninsulares because they were Spanish-American they were at the top of the social class at the time. They ruled the high office, land and commonly wealth.

6 0
4 years ago
Before the civil war, the economy focused on
Svetach [21]
It was primarily tied up in the slave economy.
7 0
3 years ago
The prosecutor says these Nazi leaders did not deserve mercy. Would you have agreed? Why or why not?
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

regardless of what they did, regardless of who they are all humans deserve mercy, but this is how the law works

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement BEST describes the role of the citizen according to Hitler's "May Day" Speech of 1937? A) Governments exist to s
    15·2 answers
  • How did European conquest effect the<br> native peoples?
    15·1 answer
  • What did Manifest Destiny mean to 19th-century Americans? A) the belief that God had given the United States the right to all of
    12·2 answers
  • Which best describes how political action committees (PACs) enhance the power of individuals?
    8·1 answer
  • In what ways did racism still emerge after the civil war
    5·1 answer
  • Write converse of Pythagoras theorem​
    11·1 answer
  • Who was nebuchadnezzar ii and what did he do
    15·2 answers
  • Should the government forgive student loan debt?
    9·2 answers
  • The term migration refers to the _______ of people from one place to another .
    11·2 answers
  • How could installing new technology, such as scrubber machines, affect the factories required to install them? name a positive a
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!