Under Roman law, someone accusing another person of a crime needed belief that the accused was guilty. proof that a crime had be

Question

3 years ago

14

en committed. a lawyer willing to take the case to trial. a witness to vouch for the accuser’s character.

2 answers:

kozerog [31] · Answer 1 · 2022-03-07T00:43:30+03:00

5 0

The romans didn't use lawyers, so I would say your answer was: a. witness to vouch for the accuser’s character.
Was that what you needed? :D

Vesnalui [34] · Answer 2 · 2022-03-07T03:12:03+03:00

4 0

a witness to vouch for the accuser’s character.