Answer:
Value added to the gallery will be $3000
So option (C) will be correct answer
Explanation:
We have given that Caroline sells her original painting for $1500 to an art gallery.
And after that her painting was sold to an art lover at cost of $4500
We have to find the value added to the gallery
Value added to the gallery will be equal to difference of price sold to the art lover and cost at which painting is sold to art gallery
So value added to gallery = $4500 - $1500 = $3000
So option (C) will be correct answer
Answer:
c. inferior good.
Explanation:
Inferior goods are items purchased buy a consumer as a result of his limited income such that when that consumer's purchasing power increases, he purchases other commodities in place of the one initially purchased.
Hence the purchase more T-bone steak and less hamburger is an indication that hamburger is an inferior good to the consumer.
Answer:
36 billion
Explanation:
The GDP can be calculated using the income approach in which the output of a country is equal to the total income people receive in that country.
GDP= Compensation of employees + Net interest + Rental income + Corporate profits
From this formula, you can isolate the compensation of employees:
Compensation of employees= GDP-Net interest - Rental income - Corporate profits
Compensation of employees= $65-$15-$7-$7
Compensation of employees= $65-$29
Compensation of employees= $36
The wages during 2009 in Sildavida were: $36 billion.
Answer: $25.50
Explanation:
Intrinsic Value of warrant = Number of shares buyable * (Market price - Warrant price)
= 6 * (14.25 - 10)
= $25.50
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
