Answer:
D) $40,000
Explanation:
The Joneses qualify for a Section 121 exemption since they lived at their house for 20 years. They are exempted from paying capital gains taxes on the first $500,000 ($250,000 if single) in realized gains from selling their home.
Joneses taxable gain = $750,000 (sales price) - $210,000 (basis) - $500,000 (section 121) = $40,000
They will have to recognize only $40,000 in gains.
According to the information given in the question, the best option to pursue would be early retirement.
Early Retirement presents a handy and exceptional way for assembly expectancies of a reduction in force (RIF). A reduction in force (RIF) takes place whilst a function is eliminated with no intention of changing it and effects an everlasting cut in headcount. A corporation may additionally decide to lessen its staff by means of terminating employees or by means of attrition
RIF occurs whilst a company completely eliminates positions. It is distinct from a furlough, wherein an employee's hours are quickly reduced. In the Federal government, layoffs are referred to as a reduction in force movements. When an agency should abolish positions, the reduction in force policies decides whether or not an employee keeps his or her gift position, or whether the employee has a proper to an extraordinary role.
Personnel reduction is a movement to lessen the range of personnel in a branch or in the County typical. Motives for a discount in force may additionally encompass, however, aren't constrained to reduced funding, reorganization, and/or modified workload.
Learn more about Retirement here brainly.com/question/27232329
#SPJ4
Based on efficiency, the businesses that should cut hair are the A and C; moreover, to meet the demand, each firm will need to offer at least two haircuts.
The supply of a product or the units of a product that is offered to potential customers should always meet the number of real customers. In the same way, the price of the product should meet the price customers are willing to pay.
In this context, the best is that only firm A and C cut hair, this is because their prices per cut ($25 and $30) match the consumers' willingness to pay this includes Lorenzo ($35), Gilberto ($50), Juanita ($40) and Neha ($25).
- Firm A can cut Neha's and Lorenzo's hair
- Firm C can cut Gilberto's and Juanita's hair
Moreover, this implies each firm needs to do at least 2 haircuts to cover all the possible customers.
In the case of firms B and D, the price per cut is high ($40 - $45). Based on this, they should not cut hair as only a few customers can pay for this service, and this would be inefficient.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/13225200
Answer:The information was expected is the most likely reason why a stock price might not react at all on the day that new information related to the stock’s issuer is released. Assuming the market is semi strong form efficient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The major reason that the stock price might not react to the information related to that stock was the expectancy of information in advance. It was a piece of expected information. When something is expected then our response towards it does not bring much change.
Similarly, when it is already expected to get some information related to the stock, on receiving that information the stock price does not react. It means it might neither fall nor rise.
Answer:
a) 2000
b) 4000
c) 2000 and 4800
Explanation:
The quantitative theory of money shows how the monetary side of an economy behaves, that is, the effect of money supply on income. It is given by the equation MV = PY, where M = money supply, V is the currency's velocity, P is the price level and Y is the real income level.
M = 500, V = 8, P = 2
a) The real income level:
MV = PY
500 x 8 = 2 x Y
Y = 2000
b) Nominal income level (price level multiplied by real income)
PY
2 x 2000 = 4000
C) If the money supply increases by 20%, ie to 600, the real income will be:
MV = PY
600 x 8 = 2.4 x Y (Y is full employment income, so the effects of money supply will be on the price level)
Y = 2000 Real income remains the same, increase in money supply does not affect real output, only price level, which increases from 2 to 2.4.
The nominal income, in turn, will be:
PY
2.4 x 2000 = 4800
That is, an increase in the money supply only increases nominal income.
