Answer: Company Pays $1640
Carol Bryd pays $410
Explanation:
The total bill is $2300 and the deductible needs to be taken out.
$2300-$250
=$2050
Company Payment.
Company Pays 80% which translates to 0.8
0.8*2050
= $1640 is the company Payment.
Carol then pays the difference which is
$2050 - $1640
= $410
Carol pays $410
Answer:
b. False
Explanation:
Firms are not in competition with many other firms in every market structure. Some market structures such as monopolies or oligopolies feature either one single firm, or only a few firms, that frequently collude instead of competing.
Not all firms leave the market as soon as they lose profits. Some do, but others stay. A monopoly can survive decades without increasing its profits.
Not all firms will try to maximize profits, some will try to maximize market share instead, especially in perfectly-competitive market structures.
Not all firms face a horizontal demand curve. In some market structures, demand can be very dynamic, either sloping upwards (increasing) or downwards (decreasing).
Answer:
b. laboratory experiments.
Explanation:
Laboratory experiments -
It refers to the practice of an experiment in a appropriate and controlled condition , is referred to as the laboratory experiments .
In this case , the experiment involve some standard conditions , which are necessary for the experiment to occur .
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct option is laboratory experiments.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The production utilization is the use of the productive capacity of the firm. It shows the extent to which the production capacity of the firm can be used to produce the goods in the firm.
It shows the relationship between the output that has been produced with the equipment that has been installed in the enterprise. If the capacity of the firm is totally utilised, it is very efficient and can be used to produce the maximum amount of goods of that enterprise.
Answer:
Answer for the question
Some observers had argued that Uber’s greatest problem was not any of its scandals, but its CEO Travis Kalanick. Now that Kalanick no longer serves that role, how much better off is Uber really? Where do you come down? Do you think Kalanick’s reduced profile will turn the tide for Uber? Or is Kalanick’s drive and competitiveness necessary to Uber’s continued success, regardless of the title he holds? If you were on the board, what would you recommend? And why?
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
