Answer:
44.44%
Explanation:
Profit is obtained by subtracting cost from revenue.
I,e.,
Profit = revenue - cost.
In this case,
Profit = $135,000 - $75,000
Profit = $60,000
As a percentage of revenue
= $60,000/ $135,000 x 100
= 0.44444 x 100
= 44.44 %
Answer:
Howdy Doody show in the 2018 income statement as income from this investment is $24225
Explanation:
given data
purchased = 15%
common stock = $58,000
net income 2018 = $15,000
net income 2019 = $58,000
dividend = $61,500
fair value = $73,000
to find out
How much Howdy Doody show in the 2018 income statement as income from this investment
solution
we know that net income to be reported as income by investment is the sum of income from dividend + unrealised gain
so here
unrealised gain = increase in value of stock that is
= $73,000 - $58,000 = $15000 .............1
and
income from dividend is = 15 % of $61,500
income from dividend = $9225 .................2
now add equation 1 and 2
Howdy doody show in 2018 income statement as income from this investment = Dividend revenue + Unrealized holding gain
income statement = $9225 + $15000
income statement = $24225
Answer: Increase of $8,200
Explanation:
Currently, the company is making a net operating income of;
= Contribution Margin - Fixed expenses
= (90 * 6,700) - 547,700
= $55,300
If the company advertises, net operating income becomes;
= Contribution margin with increase in sales - Fixed expenses including advertisements
= (90 * (6,700 + 170)) - (547,700 + 7,100)
= $63,500
Increase in operating income = 63,500 - 55,300
= $8,200
A, all of above because they are all the study of economics
Answer:
Explanation:
When an individual’s current money income exceeds his current consumption desires, hesaves the excess. Rather than keep these savings in his possession, the individual mayconsider it worthwhile to forego immediate possession of the money for a larger futureamount of consumption. This trade-off of present consumption for a higher level of futureconsumption is the essence of investment.An investment is the current commitment of funds for a period of time in order to derivea future flow of funds that will compensate the investor for the time value of money, theexpected rate of inflation over the life of the investment, and provide a premium for theuncertainty associated with this future flow of funds.2.Students in general tend to be borrowers because they are typically not employed so haveno income, but obviously consume and have expenses. The usual intent is to invest themoney borrowed in order to increase their future income stream from employment - i.e.,students expect to receive a better job and higher income due to their investment ineducation.3.In the 20-30 year segment an individual would tend to be a net borrower since he is in arelatively low-income bracket and has several expenditures - automobile, durable goods,etc. In the 30-40 segment again the individual would likely dissave, or borrow, since hisexpenditures would increase with the advent of family life, and conceivably, the purchaseof a house.In the 40-50 segment, the individual would probably be a saver since incomewould have increased substantially with no increase in expenditures. Between the ages of50 and 60 the individual would typically be a strong saver since income would continueto increase and by now the couple would be “empty-nesters.”After this, depending uponwhen the individual retires, the individual would probably be a dissaver as incomedecreases (transition from regular income to income from a pension).4.The saving-borrowing pattern would vary by profession to the extent that compensationpatterns vary by profession. For most white-collar professions (e.g., lawyers) incomewould tend to increase with age. Thus, lawyers would tend to be borrowers in the earlysegments (when income is low) and savers later in life. Alternatively, blue-collarprofessions (e.g., plumbers), where skill is often physical, compensation tends to remainconstant or decline with age. Thus, plumbers would tend to be savers in the earlysegments and dissavers later (when their income declines).5.The difference is because of the definition and measurement of return. In the case of theWSJ, they are only referring to the current dividend yield on common stocks versus thepromised yield on bonds. In the University of Chicago studies, they are talking about thetotal rate of return on common stocks, which is the dividend yield plus the capital gain or
