C. Surviving on nuts and roots
Answer:
The answer is avoidance rationalization.
Explanation:
This type of rationalization accepts that a problem exists, but avoids any confrontation by offering little or no analysis for solving it.
One of the arguments a person under this phenomenon may use, is precisely saying that the situation was worse in the past. Other examples include addressing other problems by saying "they are more important".
Answer:
c. the Americans were more interdependent than the Japanese
Explanation:
American students tends to be more interdependent than the Japanese students as researched by Kleinknecht and colleagues (Kleinknecht, Dinnel, Kleinknecht, Hiruma, & Harada) in 1997.
Answer:
This scenario most likely exemplifies <u>expectancy confirmation</u>.
Explanation:
The expectation confirmation model conceives satisfaction as the result of a contrast or comparison between the reality perceived by the individual and some type of comparison standard (expectations, norms based on experience, etc.). The propositions of the model are satisfaction is related to the degree and direction of the discrepancy between expectations and performance. Producing what has been called confirmation of expectations when the performance is initially expected, negative disconfirmation, when the performance is lower than expected, then dissatisfaction appears.
