I dont really understand the word
<span>efficacy
but the others dont seem to make sense to me so i would say D unless i just am misunderstanding a key concept </span>
Answer:Well for starters, the King overthrew a democratic government and established a rule by a council that he chose. They were also split into classes and weren't allowed to criticize the king in any way. The military also had huge power and worked for the king so that was a problem for anyone who wanted to protest or anything similar.
Explanation:
brainliest me please
Language is the communication barrier regarding the case, and the use of an instant translator is essential to provide culturally sensitive care.
In the case study related to the question, Fatima Sonogo is with her husband in a hospital in need of medical care, and the language prevents them from correctly understanding the applied medical procedures, and the translator is necessary to reduce the patient's anxiety by providing information.
<h3 /><h3>What is culturally sensitive care?</h3>
They are related to the set of procedures applied in a hospital to provide complete patient care, covering cultural issues that can impact on effective, dignified and complete patient care.
Therefore, culturally sensitive care helps to reduce prejudice, in greater equality and ethics in health institutions.
Find out more about culturally sensitive care here:
brainly.com/question/12710273
#SPJ1
The Legislative branch consists of the Senate and The House Of Representatives.
The Executive branch consists of the President(Donald Duck:P) and 50,000,000.
The Judicial branch includes Supreme Court and lower Courts.
The statement is - False.
History textbooks, more often than not, are not interpreted objectively and very often the perspective and interests of the nation were a certain history textbook is out for the wider public is subjective and with nationalistic elements. This is the case in most of the countries in the world and there's countless number of examples of it, like:
The Republic of Macedonia is claiming the Macedonia region in Greece as its own ethnic and historic territory and that Alexander the Great is Macedonian, and even though it was ethnic territory of the Macedonians till recently, a Macedonian state was not existent and ruling over the region for approximately two millenniums. Greece on the other hand claims the Macedonia region as its own historic region and ALexander the Great is Greek, even though the Greeks never managed to take that region under their control until the early 20th century. Bulgarians claim that the Republic of Macedonia is their own territory as the Macedonia region in Greece as well, and considers the people in this part to be Bulgarians and that Alexander the Great is Bulgarian. That's just one simple example, and there's lots and lots around the world.
