1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
3 years ago
8

Is {(1,-2),(-2,0),(-1,2),(1,3)} a function

Mathematics
1 answer:
svp [43]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

No...this is not a function.

A function will not have ANY repeating x values.....they can have repeating y values, just not the x ones.

And this set of numbers has repeating x values of 1

in other words, in a function, all the x values have to be different numbers....none can be the same

You might be interested in
Please help if you want brianleist (no links please!) Ty!
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

The answer is 40 can I please get brainleist

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose a consumer group suspects that the proportion of households that have three cell phones NOT known to be 30%. A cell phon
leva [86]

Answer:

We conclude that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a consumer group suspects that the proportion of households that have three cell phones NOT known to be 30%.

Their marketing people survey 150 households with the result that 43 of the households have three cell phones.

Let p = <u><em>proportion of households that have three cell phones NOT known.</em></u>

So, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p = 30%      {means that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p \neq 30%     {means that the actual percentage of households different from 30%}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>One-sample z-test for proportions;</u>

                                T.S. =  \frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p = sample proportion of households having three cell phones = \frac{43}{150} = 0.29

           n = sample of households = 150

So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{0.29-0.30}{\sqrt{\frac{0.30(1-0.30)}{150} } }  

                                     =  -0.27

The value of z test statistic is -0.27.

<u>Also, P-value of the test statistics is given by;</u>

              P-value = P(Z < -0.27) = 1 - P(Z \leq 0.27)

                            = 1 - 0.6064 = <u>0.3936</u>

<u>Now, at 1% significance level the z table gives critical value of -2.58 and 2.58 for two-tailed test.</u>

Since our test statistic lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which <em><u>we fail to reject our null hypothesis</u></em>.

Therefore, we conclude that the actual percentage of households is equal to 30%.

4 0
3 years ago
A researcher surveyed 220 residents of a city about the number of hours they
olga55 [171]

Answer:

Margin of error of 0.0485 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have that to find our \alpha level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.95}{2} = 0.025

Now, we have to find z in the Ztable as such z has a pvalue of 1 - \alpha.

That is z with a pvalue of 1 - 0.025 = 0.975, so Z = 1.96.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}

In which \sigma is the standard deviation of the population and n is the size of the sample.

In this question:

\sigma = 0.35, n = 220

The margin of error is of:

M = z\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}

M = 1.96\frac{0.35}{\sqrt{200}}

M = 0.0485

Margin of error of 0.0485 hours.

5 0
3 years ago
Megan buys 3 bracelets and 3 necklaces each bracelet cost 5 dollars each in dollars of one she gave the clerk 40$
Tatiana [17]

Not sure what answer your needing so here is a breakdown of the amounts.

3 bracelets times $5 equals $15

How much is each necklace?

Subtract $15 from $40 you have $25 left. Then you divide $25 by 3 you get each necklace costs $8.33 so three necklaces cost $24.99

When you add $15 from the bracelets and $24.99 from the necklaces your total is $39.99 that’s why Megan gave the clerk $40

Hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
How do I do this thanks
Aleks04 [339]
So you start by subtracting 3 from 35, which is 32. 32/8 = 4. So three years ago, Tim's son was 4 and Tim was 32. The percentage is about 13%
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The first term and the common ratio of a G.P are respectively 3 and 1/2.write down the first five terms​
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE Solve Fast |x+2|&lt;4
    5·1 answer
  • Write log10 10000 = 4 in exponential form
    9·1 answer
  • Translate the statement into a confidence interval for p. Approximate the level of confidence.
    5·1 answer
  • . Show that square of any positive integer can not be of form 7q + 3 or 7q+5or 7q + 6, for any integer q
    8·1 answer
  • -2|x|=20<br> Solve for x
    15·2 answers
  • What is 12 over 42 in simplest form?
    5·2 answers
  • A multiple-choice test consists of 10 questions. Each question has answer choices of a ,b c, d ,e , and , and only one of the ch
    9·1 answer
  • Three years ago, Jolene bought $525 worth of stock in a software company. Since then the value of her purchase has been increasi
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help me with this
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!