Answer:
selling an investment for more than they paid for it
Hope this helps plz mark me brainliest
Answer: Price ceilings are beneficial to society, and are often necessary, in that they make sure that essential goods are financially accessible to the average person, at least in the short run. By lowering costs, price ceilings also have the beneficial effect of helping to stimulate demand, which can contribute to the health of an economy.
However, there can also be downsides to price ceilings. While they stimulate demand, price ceilings can also cause shortages. Where the ceiling is set, there is more demand than at the equilibrium price. This means that the amount of the good or service supplied is less than the quantity demanded.
For example: in agriculture, medicine, and education, many governments set maximum prices to make the needed goods or services more affordable. Producers may respond to such an economic situation by rationing supplies, decreasing production levels or lowering the quality of production, making the consumer pay extra for otherwise free elements of the good (features, options, etc.), and more.
Request: Can I please get brainliest
Answer:
The answer is option C. achieve economies of scope.
Explanation:
An Economies of scope is a proportionate saving gained by producing two or more distinct goods, when the cost of doing so is less than that of producing each separately.
Based on the scenario portrayed in the question, the office management firm is hoping to achieve economies of scope.
The correct answer is d). We have that government spending can also give way to products and services, just like private enterprises, thus there is no double-counting there. Services such as haircuts have their own value, which are separate from any other material products. Finally exports are also not counted twice; Raw materials though would be counted twice if we counted them for the GDP since their value is incorporated in the value of the final product. For example, we cannot count towards the GDP the value of rubber production in a country since then, if we counted the value of the tires too, we would count the value of the rubber in the tires twice (one time as rubber/ one time as part of the tire).
Answer:
compared to a mixed economy, a market economy tends to benefit the consumers.
This is mainly because the government intervention and restrictions are minimum in a market economy, compared to a mixed economy in which the government plays a major part as an economic agent and a regulator.
A free market system's main aim is to enhance the competitions and the freedom of choice for the consumers.
However, in the real world scenarios, pure free market systems are difficult to be seen and most of the time, the economies are Mixed economies.
Even in USA's economy 40% of the economy consists of the government agencies and activities.
This is mainly due to the economic malpractices by the producers and corporations.
Explanation:
