Answer:
The answer is c. Increase in assests and increase in stockholder's equity.
Explanation:
The accounting entries Crossroads Mall will have for the sell of repurchased shares as followed:
Dr Cash 280,000
Dr Paid-up capital and/or Retained Earning 20,000
Cr Common share 300,000
( further calculation notes: sold of 10,000 repurchased shares at $28 brings about 280,000 in cash; while common shares will be recorded at the repurchased price, that is : 30 x 10,000)
Thus, the net effect of the sale of repurchased shares will be the Increase in Cash ( assets) of $280,000 and the Increase in Stock Equity of the same amount, that is, $280,000.
Answer:
<em>Employer may legally discriminate based on BFOQ</em>
Explanation:
Bona Fide Occupational Qualification BFOQ gives an employer the right to employ individuals base on sex, age, nationality, gender if they see these characteristics as bona fide occupational qualification. In doing this, the employer must be able to show that the reason for employing based on these characteristics is very vital to the production of their company, and that only these particular characteristics are necessary for the safety and efficiency of the employee. In this case, it is possible that the bona fide occupational qualification for this job is that the candidate must be or above 60 years of age.
Answer:
Answered
Explanation:
a)Even at twice the original price, the marginal utility per dollar of the 20th train trip may be higher than the corresponding ratio for any other good that Ann might consume, in which case she would be perfectly rational not to alter the number of trips she takes.
After all, missing a trip would be to miss a whole day’s work.
b.) meals.
The higher price of train tickets makes Ann poorer. The income effect of the price
increase is what leads to the reduction in the number of restaurant meals she eats.
This is more of an ethics question and up to each individuals beliefs, but I'll try my best to answer it for you. "I would not kill the one innocent person to save five other people because no one's life is greater than another's. The five people would die if I hadn't intervened at all and that one death would be on me. The same would apply to the second scenario, I would not kill the five people to save one."
