Answer:
- When making an analysis and map of another person’s argument, you should correct obvious mistakes.
- In analyzing and mapping the statements in an argument, context is not important.
Explanation:
The argument map is made to present a visual representation of the structure of an argument, showing all the premises, objections, counter-arguments, themes and statements that led to the construction of the given argument. This type of representation is used to support the reasoning and critical thinking of whoever is analyzing the argument.
In this case, whoever analyzes the arch for the construction of maps, must not correct errors, even small and perceptible errors, but must build the map the way the argument was built, even with its mistakes and successes. The context of the argument is very important at this point, since without the context, it is impossible to determine the reasoning and thinking that composed the argument.
It will burn and it will turn red then the hydrogen in that outer core hope that helps a little
ANSWER
Iyan po ang nakita ko
sorry nalang po kung mali
<span>Adolescent peer groups known as reference groups set standards against which adolescents can judge their abilities and social success. A reference group is a group of people where people can compare themselves with others in the group. Usually the people in this group have a similarity like age, status, or other commonalities.</span>
It showed that direct rewards and punishments are not necessary for learning. its called modeling.
