Answer:
d the Roman empire was only in europe
Answer:
Why were the Articles of Confederation so weak?
- the colonists feared a government that would be too much like the British king
Define an Indentured Servant
- a person who signed a 7 year contract to work for someone in order to come to the colonies
Explanation:
1. Why were the Articles of Confederation so weak?
After finally getting rid of the British, the colonists feared a powerful government that would have a choke hold over the colonies. The Government in the AoC had no power to inforce laws, collect taxes, no courts, there needed to be unanimous votes, etc.
2. Define an Indentured Servant
An indentured servan is a person who signs indentures to work for another for a specified time in return for payment of travel expenses and maintenance.
Na geografia<span> da </span>Antiguidade<span>, especialmente em fontes </span>romanas<span>, </span>Dácia<span> era o nome dado à região habitada pelos </span>dácios<span> (ou </span>getas<span>, como eram conhecidos pelos </span>antigos gregos<span>), um ramo dos </span>trácios<span> que vivia a norte dos </span>Bálcãs.<span>A Dácia tinha como suas fronteiras meridionais o </span>rio Danúbio<span> - Istro (</span>Istros<span>), nas fontes gregas) - ou, em sua maior extensão, o </span>Monte Hemo<span> (em </span>latim<span>: </span>Haemus Mons<span>), atual cordilheira dos Bálcãs. A </span>Mésia<span> (</span>Dobrogea<span>), uma área a sul do Danúbio, era o centro da região onde os getas viviam e interagiam com os antigos gregos. A leste, tinha como fronteiras naturais o </span>Ponto Euxino<span> (</span>Mar Negro) e o rio Danastro (Danastris<span>, atualmente </span>Dniester), citado nas fontes gregas como Tiras (Tyras<span>). Diversos povoados dácios foram </span>
Answer:Many matured into advanced pre-Columbian Mesoamerican civilizations such as the: Olmec, Izapa, Teotihuacan, Maya, Zapotec, Mixtec, Huastec, Purépecha, Totonac, Toltec, and Aztec, which flourished for nearly 4,000 years before the first contact with Europeans.
Explanation:
The Sermon of Pope Urban II at Clermont and the Ibn al-Zaki’s account of A Khutba on the Recovery of Jerusalem are very much alike. The first one, pronounced in 1095, was a call for all the great lords and knights of Christianity, especially those in the Council of Clermont, French and German, to recover the sacred land of Jerusalem from the hands of the heathens, the Muslims. The Pope encouraged them to leave everything behind to engage in this sacred war, a war ordered by God, and promised the fighters forgiveness of all their sins. This became the first Crusade.
On the other hand, the account on the recovery of Jerusalem was given on 1187, after the Muslims recovered Jerusalem from the hands of the Christians. It's a congratulation to those who fought in that holy war, ordered by God, and a call to keep fighting to erase all trace of the heresy brought by the Christians. So, all in all, both speeches were given by a high authority in both religions, they both claimed to be the real one and viewed the other as a fake, saw the fight for Jerusalem as a holy one.