Answer:
D. On the trade routes connecting Europe, Asia, and Africa
Explanation:
The Fertile Crescent was widely known as the cradle of civilization. However, it is also known as "Crossroads" because the territory covers a large expanse of lands which spans across three continents, including present Africa, Europe, and Asia. Some of the countries are Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Palestine, Turkey, Jordan, etc.
Hence, the correct answer is option D. On the trade routes connecting Europe, Asia, and Africa
According to Al Bakri, Kumbi Saleh (Ghana) consisted of two towns. In one town lived the arabs, it held twelve mosquets and numerous wells of sweet water. In this town lived learned men, as well as jurists and religious men. Six miles away laid the city where the king lived (Al Ghaba), in a palace surrounded by a defensive wall.
Only the king and his heir could wear sewn clothes and other accessories, signs of wealth, while the common people that followed his religion could only dress with simplicity, shaving their beards and hair. The king's way of living would exude power, wealth and magnificence, and his followers could only show humility by kneeling and sprinting their heads with dust. While the arabs would greet him by clapping.
As I understand it, the customs in arab lands were much more equal, there were not big social differences between its inhabitants. In the other part of the city, this was not the case, there would be big social differences between the king and its followers, that the author doesn't name bi its etniciti, nationality or religion. They were just the followers of the king.
here are some...
Habeas corpus, known as the right to due process, said that free men could only be imprisoned and punished after lawful judgment by a jury of their peers.
Justice could not be sold, denied, or delayed.
Civil lawsuits did not have to be held in the king's court.
Answer:
Thank yo for asking this...I was waiting for someone to ask me this.
EXPLANATION: This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes
What are the available choices?
