The article develop the idea that there was a lot of diversity within the Anti-Federalist movement because lot of them have a different views on the constitution.
<h3>Who are the Anti-Federalists?</h3>
It referred to those group that unsuccessfully opposed the strong central government envisioned in the U.S. Constitution of 1787 and whose agitations led to the addition of a Bill of Rights
They argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government while taking too much power away from state and local governments.
Many of them also felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.
Read more about Anti-Federalists
brainly.com/question/11618481
#SPJ1
Being a sharecropper or raising cotton in 1875 in Mississippi is exhausting, demeaning and destroys personal initiative. Being a share cropper might mean that you will have a little something left over for yourself if you have a very good crop. But without good crops, you will have nothing. My family and I work in the fields from sun up to sundown. We don’t own the land we work on. Our owner lets us grow crops on his land and takes a percentage of any profit. Sometimes we make enough money to have enough to eat and clothe ourselves. But it is more often that we just barely scrimp by. We eat what we can grow and on occasion, we can kill a chicken that we have raised. It is not a life you would wish on anyone.
It was a kind of social protest - people did not want to be discriminated because of their race or sex. This event was a precedence - nobody thought that something like this protest could occur at that time. Rosa Parks did something that made people think about tolerance and also made other people join her protest in different places.
It would be commutative property because no matter how you put the situation the answer will not be different/ and or wont change