Answer: behavioral
Explanation: The tendency in an individual that make him behave in a certain way in a particular situation is called the behavioral component of his attitude. It depicts the intention of a person.
In the given case, Kimberley wants to inform her subordinate what she has not achieved and also advice her how she can improve. This shows that she has a developing instinct and leadership quality in her.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": the Macro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing fishing boats, and the Micro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing guava jelly.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is an advantage an individual, organization or country has to use <em>opportunity costs</em> in their production compared to their competitors. The scenario described above does not imply that the individual, organization or country has an absolute advantage.
In the example proposed:
- Comparative advantage of Macro islands in fishing boats =
- Comparative advantage of Micro islands in fishing boats =
- Comparative advantage of Macro islands in jars =
- Comparative advantage of Micro islands in jars =
Thus, <em>the Macro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing fishing boats, and the Micro Islands have a comparative advantage in producing guava jelly.</em>
I don’t understand what you are trying to say or what your question is?
Answer:
We should not lower taxes for the wealthiest Americans because they own and run a lot of companies and businesses that we use. Lower income Americans want their leaders to understand or know what it’s like to be less wealthy so they’ll be more sympathetic towards lower income people and won’t do everything out of the want for more money. If they have to pay lower taxes, then that takes away from their ability to sympathize with lower income homes, and that would upset a lot of people.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The first part was true. A higher WACC results in a lower NPV simply because a higher discount rate results in a lower present value.
E.g. 100 / (1 + 6%)³ = 83.96, but if we increase r to 10%, then 100 / (1 + 10%)³ = 75.13
The second part is wrong because under the IRR method, the decision rule is very simple, all projects are accepted if their IRR is higher than the project's WACC (or discount rate). I.e. if hte project's WACC increases, so does the chance of the project being rejected because the IRR might be lower than the WACC.
