Answer:
c. have a temporary competitive advantage
Explanation:
In this case, it is correct to say that the company has a temporary competitive advantage, as there is a substitute for its valuable, rare and expensive service to imitate.
The company gained a competitive advantage in the market for being the only one to offer that service, which by the attributes confer barriers of entry for new competitors, but when there is a substitute for the service and that have the same characteristics, it is correct to say that the company it will lose its competitive advantage in a matter of time, because with more competitors in the market it is common for there to be some loss of market share, so in this case it is ideal for the company to adapt and seek new attributes to innovate, generate more value for consumers and so seek a differential that will guarantee you a higher position in the market.
Answer:
1.- Without Retrospective effect
2.- No as it comes from a change in estimations not an accounting error.
3.- yes. It will give a full explanation about the reasons to extend the useful life.
4.- Depreciation expense for 2021: 60,000
Explanation:
1.- The change in the useful life does not represent an accounting error. It comes from the estimation process.
800,000 - 160,000 x 2 = 480,000 book value at beginning 2021
480,000 / 8 new useful life = 60,000 depreciation per year.
Answer: The correct answer is "b. production and distribution processes becoming obsolete.".
Explanation: The typical risks of a cost leadership strategy include production and distribution processes becoming obsolete because to maintain cost leadership, the production and distribution processes must always be in constant observation to modify if necessary in order to maintain competitiveness and not remain stuck attached to a production and distribution model that as a consequence of innovations in the competition may become obsolete.
in this case, identical changes in autonomous consumption and autonomous government spending: <span> have different effects on equilibrium income
When a factor is implemented and have two different reaction, it is safe to assume that that factor have two different effects.
For example, an increasing interest in technology(autonomous consumption) may increased the investment for tech products. The government spending may not give as much influence in this context because it wont affect the transaction between the customers and the producer
</span>
Answer:
Cost per equivalent unit: $60
Explanation:
Cost per equivalent unit = (Cost of Beginning Work in Progress Inventory + Total production cost during the period) / Equivalent Units of Production (EUP)
Total Production Cost = $90,000
Equivalent Units of production (EUP) = 1,300 + 400 x 50% = 1,500 units
Cost per equivalent unit: $90,000 / 1,500 units = $60
