1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
12

American leaders explained their decision to enter World War I by saying they wanted to win the war to gain new territory. keep

the oceans safe for shipping. punish those who made war on civilians. make the world safe for democracy.
History
2 answers:
sdas [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Make the world safe for democracy

which is ironic because overseas they where fighting for the freedom of other people but back at home there was still massive amounts of segregation against blacks and other minority groups

Explanation:

kvv77 [185]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

American leaders explained their decision to enter World War I by saying they wanted <u>to make the world safe for democracy.</u>

Explanation:

On April 2, 1917, US President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to declare war on Germany in order to make the world safe for democracy in what became known as his War Message. For Wilson, as well as for many American leaders, Germany's militarism was a threat democracy to all nations because its government was violent to both their own domestic constituents and to other democratic nations, and, as declared by Wilson: “No autocratic government could be trusted to keep faith within it or observe its covenants.”

You might be interested in
Hey! please help me its for an important test! please help!
Snezhnost [94]

I would say A.. ending child labor.


Lewis Hine was an activist for the National Child Labor Committee. Mother Jones was a school teacher as well as a female activist. Even though she was most famous for being the founder of the Industrial Workers of the World, I think she would be united with Lewis Hine with ending child labor.

6 0
3 years ago
How does a republic differ from the colonial form of government experience before the American revolution?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Prior to the Revolutionary War, the US experienced a colonial form of government, which differs from a Republic in several significant ways:

  • A colony is ruled by a foreign power. In the case of the US, this power was England. A republic, on the other hand, is autonomous, and it forms its own government.
  • A colony is usually ruled by a monarch (it is not a necessary requirement, but it has been so in practice), while republics elect their leader through voting.  
  • Republics tend to be democratic and participatory, with no inherited power positions.
  • A republic has the power to make its own laws in terms of taxation, rights and duties, education, healthcare, etc. while the colony has to follow those of the mother country.
  • Republics tend to have their own constitution.
4 0
3 years ago
Identify and analyze the arguments over slavery in the New Western Territories after the Mexican War (1846–1848).
Pepsi [2]
The ones who controlled the territories would have the main political power in the congress. If the states were slave states then it would bother non-slave states in the congress, and vice versa. That's why it was necessary to create new states that weren't the former Mexican ones that would help balance out the power of the two factions.
<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Which language family is connected to Roman Empire ?<br> A:Germanic B:Slavic C;Romance .
MArishka [77]

Answer:

The answer is Germanic

6 0
3 years ago
Do you think Rockefeller deserved to be called a<br> "robber baron" Why or why not?
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

"Robber baron" is a derogatory term of social criticism originally applied to certain wealthy and powerful 19th-century American businessmen. The term appeared as early as the August 1870 issue of The Atlantic Monthly magazine. By the late 1800s, the term was typically applied to businessmen who used exploitative practices to amass their wealth. These practices included exerting control over natural resources, influencing high levels of government, paying subsistence wages, squashing competition by acquiring their competitors to create monopolies and raise prices, and schemes to sell stock at inflated prices to unsuspecting investors. The term combines the sense of criminal and illegitimate aristocracy.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which BEST indicates that americans supported Franklin Roosevelt's proposed economic and business policies in 1932?
    9·1 answer
  • Who governed the hebrews before they had a king
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following groups of people is an example of a corporation?
    6·2 answers
  • Utilized interchangeable parts in the production of muskets
    12·1 answer
  • One of the most influential and articulate modern defenders of egoism
    12·1 answer
  • What deterred many slaves from attempting to escape?
    12·2 answers
  • The Hepburn act of 1906 strengthened the power of which organization?
    10·1 answer
  • Please I need Help !!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • What was one effect on the french and Indian war on Great Britain's American colonies?
    8·2 answers
  • Women in the late 1800s organized and marched to gain the right to _?_.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!