Answer:
poverty, lack of education, lack of law inforcement
Explanation:
hope this helps
The government encouraged the construction of the transcontinental railroad bypassing the Pacific Railway Act in 1862 and by presenting land to railroad companies for every mile of track spread by that railroad company.
<h3 /><h3>What is Pacific Railway Act 1862?</h3>
The Pacific Railroad Acts of 1862 existed a series of acts of Congress that enabled the construction of a "transcontinental railroad" in the United States by authorizing the assignment of government bonds and the contributions of land to railroad companies. The Pacific Railway Act, which evolved into law on July 1, 1862, offered government incentives to assist “men of talent, men of personality, men who are willing to invest” in designing the nation's first transcontinental rail line.
Pacific Railway Acts, (1862, 1864), two estimates that furnished federal subsidies in land and loans for the structure of a transcontinental railroad across the United States. The government encouraged the construction of the transcontinental railroad bypassing the Pacific Railway Act in 1862 and by presenting land to railroad companies for every mile of track spread by that railroad company.
<h3 />
To learn more about Pacific Railway Act 1862 refer to:
brainly.com/question/13230362
#SPJ4
Schachter and Singer's study suggests that emotions are the result of both cognitive and physiological processes. According to their study, individuals respond in different ways to a shot of adrenaline and that will depend on the context they find themselves in. In this situational context, <u>if an individual is uninformed or misinformed about the effect of epinephrine and interacts with an angry person, he/she will show an angry response.</u>
Answer:
It gave people the right to elect members of Parliament.
Explanation:
It could not be a democratic republic because regardless of having a Bill of Rights or not, England was a monarchial government. It could not be that the king could pass laws without Parliament’s approval because the Bill of Rights did the exact opposite; it limited the King’s power. It did not allow Roman Catholics to be kings or queens because it was never explicitly stated on the Bill of Rights. It did give the people individual rights, the rights to elect members to Parliament.
Answer:
is there a picture about tthe question
