1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lilavasa [31]
3 years ago
6

Problem 3.22: Trade Deficits and J-curve Adjustment Path Assume the United States has the following import/export volumes and pr

ices. It undertakes a major "devaluation" of the dollar, say 18% on average against all major trading partner currencies. What is the pre-devaluation and post-devaluation trade balance
Business
1 answer:
Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The pre-devaluation cost is ($880) and the pst-devaluation trade balance is ($1398)

Explanation:

Assumptions Values

Initial spot exchange rate, $/fc $2.00

Price of exports, dollars ($) * 20.0000

Price of imports, foreign currency (fc) * 12.0000

Quantity of exports, units * 100

Quantity of imports, units * 120

Percentage devaluation of the dollar 18.00%

Price elasticity of demand, imports * (0.900)

a. The pre-devaluation trade balance--

Revenues from exports, $ $2,000

Expenditures on imports, fc * 1,440

Expenditures on imports, $ $2,880

Pre-devaluation trade balance ($880)

b. Resulting trade balance immediately after devaluation

Revenues from exports, $ $2,000

Expenditures on imports, fc * 1,440

New spot exchange rate, after devaluation $2.36

Expenditures on imports, $ $3,398

Post-devaluation trade balance (currency contract period) ($1,398)

You might be interested in
When the government imposes price floors or price​ ceilings, A. some people​ win, some people​ lose, and there is a loss of econ
xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

The answer is: A) some people​ win, some people​ lose, and there is a loss of economic efficiency.

Explanation:

When the government imposes a price ceiling, some consumers win since they buy cheaper products (lower than equilibrium price) but suppliers lose. Inf the government decides a price floor is better, then customers will lose and some suppliers will win (prices are higher than equilibrium price).

Both price ceilings and price floors cause deadweight loss, decreasing economic efficiency.

5 0
3 years ago
Using the logic of the two-sided search model, compare the impact on the economy of government spending on education and apprent
Inga [223]

Answer:

Recent changes in American public assistance programs have emphasized the role of work. Employer subsidies such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit (WtW) are designed to encourage employment by reimbursing employers for a portion of wages paid to certain welfare and food stamp recipients, among other groups. a simple dynamic search model of employment subsidies was developed and then test the model’s implications for the

employment outcomes of WOTC- and WtW-subsidized workers. The model predicts that subsidized workers will have higher rates of employment and higher wages than equally productive unsubsidized workers, and it highlights some possible effects of the subsidy on job tenure. predictions was tested using a unique administrative data set from the state of Wisconsin. These data provide information on demographic characteristics, employment histories, and WOTC and WtW participation for all welfare and food stamp recipients in the state for the years 1998 -2001. from those of eligibility.

The employment, wage, and job tenure effects of the WOTC and WtW using propensity score was estimated.

The estimation the effects of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and the Welfare to Work Tax Credit (WtW) on employment outcomes of disadvantaged workers. These credits offer

subsidies to firms that hire individuals who may otherwise have difficulty finding jobs, such as certain welfare recipients, disadvantaged youth, and disabled individuals. Past work on previous employer-based credits found weak or even nonexistent employment effects, which resulted in the elimination of these

subsidies. The WOTC has been reauthorized four times since its implementation in 1996, and the WtW three times since its implementation in 1998, yet no study has carefully examined their effectiveness.

An analytical model of the WOTC and WtW were developed that allows workers from the same population to be paid different wages based on their value to the particular firms in which they are

employed. I also incorporate a binding minimum wage, which results in some long-term unemployment.

Finally, wages and employment status to change over time as employers learn about workers’ productivity in their firm. This dynamic element is essential to the model, since predictions about wage trajectories and job tenure cannot be made based on a static model. For example, concerns that

disadvantaged workers will end up in short-term, low-paying jobs cannot be addressed analytically without a model that allows changes in employment status over time. This gradual learning treats job matches as “experience goods” whose value cannot be determined ex ante.

Flinn (2003) introduces a minimum wage and investigates its effects on labor market outcomes and welfare in a search framework. Flinn incorporates the possibility of wage bargaining, and analyzes the effects of the minimum wage under different levels of worker bargaining power. Adding bargaining power to the model allows him to relax Jovanovic’s assumption that workers are always paid their (expected) marginal products; this is an important consideration if firms in certain markets are able to extract some rents from workers and pay wages closer to the reservation wage.

However, Flinn’s mode assumes that there is no uncertainty about productivity, even at the time of hire. In the context of the low wage labor market, in which employers might perceive some risks of hiring inexperienced workers, this assumption is restrictive. I therefore develop a model that maintains the bargaining and minimum wage

aspects of Flinn’s model but incorporates a simple form of uncertainty based on Jovanovic (1979), allowing job matches to be characterized as experience goods. This hybrid model is extended to include wage subsidies for a particular subset of workers.

7 0
3 years ago
Sanchez Foods Inc. is a large food manufacturing corporation that earns more profits than its competitors. The company uses only
frez [133]

Answer:

green marketing

Explanation:

From the question we are informed about the Sanchez Foods Inc. which is a large food manufacturing corporation that earns more profits than its competitors. The company uses only organically grown grains and fruits. It also promotes organic farming and helps nonprofit agencies that focus on food and nutrition causes. The company recently decided to use a third-party recycling logo. In this scenario, Sanchez Foods is most likely to have adopted the practice of green marketing.

Green marketing can be regarded as practice of developing as well as advertising products which is been

based on their real as well as their perceived environmental sustainability.

In a case, whereby green marketing activities of a Company are not substantiated from significant investments and doesn't substantiated by operational changes, the company

may be criticized as been using false or misleading advertising.

3 0
2 years ago
Frank has thirty years of service as a manager for his company. he remembers when managers had almost complete freedom to fire w
Alex787 [66]

From the described case in the question, it is clear that Frank believes in doctrine called at-will employment or employment at-will.

At-will employment is a <u>U.S term used for a condition where an employee can be fired at anytime and without any warning as long as the reason isn’t illegal by law</u>.

This type of doctrine is no longer the main doctrine used in most U.S states by the 20th century, but it was commonplace during the late 19th century.

8 0
3 years ago
Here are the 2018 and 2019 (incomplete) balance sheets for Newble Oil Corp.BALANCE SHEET AT END OF YEAR(Figures in $ millions)As
otez555 [7]

Answer:

Newble Oil Corp Balance Sheet for 2018:

Current Assets - $319 million

Net Fixed Assets - $1,290 million

Total Assets = $1,609 million

Current Liabilities - $255 million

Long-term Debts - $875 million

Total Liabilities = $1,130 million

a) Equity = Total Assets ($1,609 million) minus Total Liabilities ($1,130 million) = $479 million

Newble Oil Corp Balance Sheet for 2019:

Current Assets - $465 million

Net Fixed Assets - $1,465 million

Total Assets = $1,930 million

Current Liabilities - $249million

Long-term Debts - $1,010 million

Total Liabilities = $1,259 million

b) Equity = Total Assets ($1,930 million) minus Total Liabilities ($1,259 million) = $671 million

c) Net Income during 2019, if Newble paid dividends of $145 million:

2019 Equity plus Dividends paid minus 2018 Equity = Net Income

($671 + $145 - $479) million = $337 million

d) Depreciation charge for 2019 if Newble purchased $345 million in fixed assets:

2018 fixed assets plus new acquisition minus 2019 fixed assets =

$(1,290 + 345 - 1,465) million = $170 million

e) Change in net working capital between 2018 and 2019:

Net working capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities

2018 net working capital = $319 - $255 = $64 million

2019 net working capital = $465 - $249 = $216 million

Therefore, the change in net working capital is $216 - $64 = $152 million.

f) Debt paid off during the year:

2018 debt plus new issue minus 2019 debt balance equals debt paid off.

$(875 + 218 - 1,010) millions = $83 million

Explanation:

a) Equity is the difference between total assets and total liabilities.  In accounting equation, assets = liabilities + equity.

b) Dividends is a distribution from retained earnings (equity).  It decreases the retained net income, which increases the equity.

c) Depreciation also decreases the assets.  To find the charge for the period, we add compare the new assets balance with the old, taking into consideration new acquisitions.

d) Net working capital is the difference between current assets and current liabilities.

e) Debts paid off during the year can be obtained by comparing old debt balance with the new and additional debt issued during the period.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You never give your employees gifts, but one of your employees always gives you gifts for holidays, birthdays, and boss' day. is
    12·2 answers
  • Lisa Lasher buys 400 shares of stock on margin at $21 per share. If the margin requirement is 50 percent, how much must the stoc
    9·1 answer
  • What did you discusss in your response? Check all that apply
    15·1 answer
  • T-Bills are a security whose price can vary in the market where they are bought and sold after they are auctioned to the investi
    6·1 answer
  • After considering options, a student using the problem-solving process should next
    7·2 answers
  • A business process describes a specific set of ____.
    12·1 answer
  • When two people are talking, they want the listener to understand what they are saying. They both want to be effective communica
    6·1 answer
  • Forest City has recently implemented GAAP reporting and is attempting to determine which of the following special revenue funds
    9·1 answer
  • Loran's pretax accounting income in 20X1 is $100,000. Loran had bad debt expense for financial reporting purposes of $14,000 in
    5·1 answer
  • What objectives of internal controls are of primary interest to an auditor performing a financial statement audit?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!