Answer:
#1
__________________________________________________________
So hmmm let's do the left-hand-side first
now, let's do the right-hand-side then
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Pay attention to the two tick marks. This indicates that those sides are congruent to each other and so will the angles on the bottom and top. Therefore, we can set up the equation 
and solve for x:
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
What is it that I am supposed to be doing?
