caca and other things sorry i could t help.
Answer:
i think its B
Explanation:
If the police were giving someone a ticket it would't stop the whole traffic, i do not believe there is enough evidence to support that a bridge fell or that the accident that happened had a teenager involved in it...
Based on the information given, it should be noted that the slope cannot be interpreted as the equation makes no sense for the model.
<h3>
Interpretation of the slope.</h3>
From the information given, the explanatory variable x was the year that the observations were taken.
In this case, the values are the integer number between 1975 and 1986. The y-intercept of the equation makes no sense for the prediction as it's not in the range of the explanatory data.
Learn more about models on:
brainly.com/question/3493733
The volume of the base of the region enclosed by the parabola is; V = 9
<h3>Integral Volume of a Solid</h3>
The length of each cross-section is determined by the horizontal distance (parallel to the x-axis) from one end of the parabola to the other.
Thus;
y = 3 - 2x²
Making x the subject gives us;
x = ±√[(3 - y)/2]
Thus;
The horizontal distance is;
√[(3 - y)/2] - (-√[(3 - y)/2])
⇒ 2√[(3 - y)/2]
The area of each cross-section is simply the square of the section's side length, so the area would be;
A = (2√[(3 - y)/2])²
A = 6 - 2y
Thus, volume is;
V = 
Solving this gives V = 9
Read more about integral volume of solids at; brainly.com/question/14845570