Mètis are people of mixed European and indigenous ancestry and one of the three recognized aboriginal ppls in Canada. The use of this term (mètis) means complex and contentious and has historical and contemporary meanings. I hope I helped(:
<span>(a) Which large areas were united under one ruler? Give at least three examples
Three large areas that were united under one ruler are the Roman empire, The Alexander Magnus Empire, and the Mongolian Empire. Those three represents three empires in the history of humanity that united under one ruler huge areas, that extended between continents and different countries throughout the Earth.
(b) Which rulers of dynasties, governments, kings, or emperors united large areas under one rule? Give at least three examples.
As for the Roman Empire, it was Julio Cesar who united the brought the Empire at the peak of its power. In the case of Alexander Magnus, it was him that took the Macedonian and Greek power outsider their border governing a huge area of territories. As for the Mongolian Empire, the principal ruler and conqueror was Genghis Khan, which united the tribes and extended the influnce of its country to new reaches.
(c) What are some strategies or practices rulers have used to unify diverse people in their empires under one rule? Cite at least three strategies or practices and mention some rulers or governments that used each of those strategies.
The principal strategy in the Roman Empire was divide and conquer. They divided the enemy army into small pieces and then defeat each of them separately. Alexander Magnus used a strategy that trapped the enemy army inside a pincer. Genghis Khan often </span><span>resorted to inciting internal revolt among the enemy supporters.</span>
The reason that printing currency is a delegated power is because, our Nation needs to be able to trade among itself. If two states had different types of currency from one another it would make trade and travel between the states much more difficult as money from FL and NY would likely be different and likewise useless in each of the other states.
Technology during World War I (1914-1918) reflected a trend toward industrialism and the application of mass-productionmethods to weapons and to the technology of warfare in general. This trend began at least fifty years prior to World War Iduring the American Civil War of 1861-1865,[1] and continued through many smaller conflicts in which soldiers and strategists tested new weapons.
One could characterize the earlier years of the First World War as a clash of 20th-century technology with 19th-century warfare in the form of ineffective battles with huge numbers of casualties on both sides. On land, only in the final year of the war did the major armies made effective steps in revolutionizing matters of command and control and tactics to adapt to the modern battlefield and start to harness the myriad new technologies to effective military purposes. Tactical reorganizations (such as shifting the focus of command from the 100+ man company to the 10+ man squad) went hand-in-hand with armored cars, the first submachine guns, and automatic rifles that a single individual soldier could carry and use.
