Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
The old Roman Republic from its Empire had it's Emperor, Hail Caesar, with nearly absolute power. But being a republic then, they also had a Senate of which the Senators were elected from the people, as government's representatives of and for the people. This concept can be adapted to resemble our current legislative branch, vis-à-vis Congress. And of course our executive, commander-in-chief, stems from a less domineering figure of Rome's Emperor Caesar.
Answer:
I'm guessing A? If this is some story, I havent read it before.
They mostly believed that women would become political and devoted to causes and participating in politics which would lead them to abandon their duties towards their homes which was mostly about things like chores and being a housewife. This was the common belief among anti-suffragists, but there were also radicals who believed even worse things.
Answer:
e. enjoyed relative equality in some respects while suffering discrimination in others.
Explanation:
Women in Japan considered being as important as men in society in medieval Japan. They were the foundation of society as they care and protect their family. During the Medival period, Japanese women were mothers, warriors, and entertainers. Although women were not given the support as men, their positions and rights often depended on both their husbands after marriages and the region in where they lived.
