The league of nations held a conference for disarmament. The members were Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan.
To prevent future nation-state wars, moral disarmament intended to promote worldwide collaboration and understanding. The League of Nations conducted a disarmament conference in Geneva, Switzerland, to aid in the disarmament project. The Disarmament Conference aimed to ensure the independence of several nations while reducing a nation's arsenal of offensive weapons. Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan were the first four permanent members of the League of Nations, and the Assembly also chose four non-permanent members for terms of three years.
In the 1920s, the League of Nations stopped minor wars and improved lives in little ways. But it was unable to uphold the Treaty of Versailles, secure disarmament, or convince strong nations to put an end to hostilities. In addition, as a global organization was established during the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The League's objectives included disarmament, preventing war through global security, resolving international conflicts by diplomatic discussion, and enhancing human welfare.
Read more about the league of nations on:
brainly.com/question/15322225
#SPJ4
Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.
Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.
Answer: This is a quote from Joan Claybrook, whose words reflect her steady active citizenship work for a better democracy.
Explanation:
Joan Claybrook worked at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, was the founder and director of the congressional lobbying group Public Citizen’s Congress Watch and emeritus president of Public Citizen, a public interest advocacy nonprofit that works on civil rights and liberties, environmental issues, public participation in governmental decisions, and market accountability.
Answer:
b. disparate- impact discrimination
Explanation:
Disparate impact discrimination is a term used to refer to a situation where a member of a protected class felt harmed in a situation where he or she suffered unintentional discrimination. That is, this member suffered a type of discrimination that seemed harmless or neutral, but which harmed that member or harmed the group to which he belongs.
Answer:
You let the dog go because he's a service dog that's taking advantage of the dog and what if your dog got hurt.
Explanation:
