1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is NOT a right granted to juvenile under the Supreme Court case in re gault

Law
1 answer:
Anton [14]3 years ago
3 0
A: the right to confront witness
You might be interested in
Who conducts the performance evaluation on the battalion chief?
Fed [463]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

this is stupid

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What could happen if the police ask your name and you refuse to tell them or give them a false name?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

go to jail

Explanation:

If you refuse a Breathalyzer test, you will most likely face serious consequences. For instance, if an officer stops you and believes you are intoxicated, and you refuse to submit to a test to determine your blood-alcohol concentration (BAC), you may risk having your license suspended or even face jail time.

While you may not be under arrest at this point, refusing a Breathalyzer may not be such a great idea as prosecutors may still base a potential DUI/DWI charge on other evidence collected at the scene, including officer observations, witness testimony, or the results of a field sobriety test. In certain jurisdictions, your refusal may be used against you in any possible trial. And some state laws distinguish between refusing a mobile Breathalyzer (which can carry a small penalty) and refusing a post-arrest blood, urine, or breath test at a police station or hospital (which can result in more severe penalties).

8 0
3 years ago
What are three historic landmark cases decided by the Supreme Court? Please name each case and briefly state the topic it dealt
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy

ABA Groups Division for Public Education Programs Constitution Day

Landmark United States Supreme Court Cases

Share:

    

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Issue: Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce?

Result: The Court held that it is the role of the federal government to regulate commerce and that state governments cannot develop their own commerce-regulating laws. Further, the Court created a wide definition for “commerce,” reasoning that the term encompassed more than just selling and buying. In this case, the Court determined that regulating water navigation was in fact an act that regulated commerce.

Importance: The impact of Gibbons is still felt today as it gives the federal government a much-broader base to regulate economic transactions.

8 0
3 years ago
YOU MAY NOT PARK A PASSENGER VEHICLE AT ANY TIME
Stels [109]
Sender: true you can not
7 0
2 years ago
The scope of the authority and power held by an agency is called _____.
Helen [10]

Answer:

Attorney

Explanation:

The scope of the authority and power held by an agency is called a attorney... I hope this helps.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 guarantees certain employees unpaid leave during a family medical emergency.
    8·1 answer
  • Individual rights must be balanced against the values of society at large. For instance, the right to free speech must be balanc
    9·1 answer
  • The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that society has a corrupting influence on a people and that it was the governmen
    9·1 answer
  • 2. Which of the following is NOT true of trying juveniles as adults?
    10·2 answers
  • How is primary elections differ from national elections?
    12·2 answers
  • A central bank is concerned that inflation rates are rising too quickly. In order
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the process of evidence
    15·1 answer
  • What is the supreme law of the land in the united states?
    11·2 answers
  • Vivian (28) is the beneficiary of her deceased grandmother's traditional IRA. She received a Form 1099-R reporting the $10,000 g
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement is FALSE about the process of foreclosure on a land contract?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!