Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).
Explanation: :)
In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
<h3>What is Burglary and larceny?</h3>
Burglary is known to be the act of entering a building with the intention to carry out a crime.
Larceny is known too be a theft, and one do not need a structure or building for it.
Therefore, In the case above, the crimes that the defendant has committed is known as Burglary and larceny.
Learn more about defendant from
brainly.com/question/1259392
#SPJ12
Answer:
The War Powers Resolution needs the president to tell Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action, and bans armed forces from remaining at their bases for over than 60 days, with a 30-day withdrawal period, without authorization from Congress for use of military force or a proclamation.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
True.
You don't have to be a party to a case.
Explanation:
