Question:
If an utility company were considering an increase in electricity or gas prices in order to cover the costs of a capital investment, this sector would result in the smallest change in quantity demanded in the long run and thus higher profits. True or false?
Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
Change in the demand for gasoline and or electricity is primarily set by the number of industrial or bulk users.
Scarce goods are allocated though the help of prices. It is important to note that demand for gasoline or electricity is <u>more elastic in the long term</u>, so small changes in price will alter supply and demand in either direction in the shortrun.
The demand for gas or electricity are by nature <em><u>inelastic.</u></em> This means that when prices go up, demand goes down <em><u>but not by much.</u></em>
It means that in the short term, the individuals cannot alter their lifestyle immediately to adjust for the hike in prices.
To adjust they would have to probably purchase new devices which or cars which consume less gas or electricity.
The effect this has for the company on the overall is that they are able to achieve their aim of recouping their capital investments from the planned increase in price.
Cheers!
Answer:
19.) b, d
20.) d, a
21.) d, c
22.) a
23.) c
Hope This Helps! Have A Nice Day!!
The type of employee that would most likely be satisfied and perform at a high level is motivated employee.
<h3>Who is
Hackman and Oldham?</h3>
Richard Hackman and Greg Oldham developed a model which itself motivates employees for the jobs.
The model focuses on the perspective that if the job is not monotonous, it can motivates the employee and would not feel discouraged to work.
Hence, the type of employee that would most likely be satisfied and perform at a high level is motivated employee.
Read more on about Hackman and Oldham here: brainly.com/question/13103980
#SPJ1
The type of syllogism being used in the given sentence is a conditional syllogism.
<h3>What is Syllogism?</h3>
This refers to the use of reasoning in order to draw conclusions about something based on two premises.
Hence, we can see that conditional syllogism was used in the given premises and this is because it made use of either-or to show that if the sidewalk was wet, then that means that it must have rained.
This reasoning is faulty because there are different possible reasons for the sidewalk to be wet and not just rainfall.
Read more about syllogism here:
brainly.com/question/361872
