Answer:
A. US troops arrested many of the strikers
No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
<span> The United States break its policy of isolationism in reference to Cuba because
</span>C)The United States had monetary interests in Cuba and wanted to protect them
Explanation:
<span>Cuba was </span>a good<span> producer of things like Sugar </span>that<span> was </span>a lot of required within us<span> and in Europe </span>moreover and also theU.S.A. individuals<span> were middlemen in these trades. With </span>Spanish<span> ruling Cuba, they </span>could not<span> pursue these economic interests </span>in order that they needed<span> Cuba to become </span>freelance therefore<span> it </span>may<span> work with them.</span>
In "The Petition of William Cobbett" in volume 33 of his political register, the author clearly refers to King James as "The Oppressor", who has raised money on arbitrary means and is not administering in a way it benefits the citizens of the kingdom. It is mentioned that King James raised the money in order to fund affairs regarding "army, navy and civil listing".
