Answer:
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $138,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
Explanation: The question is incomplete but just apply the missing figures: [(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + Sales on account - Collections on account - write off) - bad debt] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $390,000 - $230,000 - $22,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
<span>"A. Improved morale and productivity." is not a benefit of safety and health programs. The morale levels have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not someone cuts their arm off because they didn't follow safety procedures. </span><span /><span>
</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. For the maximum amount that spend each month on mortgage payment is
= Gross annual income ÷ total number of months in a year × mortgage payment percentage
= $39,600 ÷ 12 months × 28%
= $924
b. . For the maximum amount that spend each month on total credit obligatons
= Gross annual income ÷ total number of months in a year × mortgage payment percentage
= $39,600 ÷ 12 months × 36%
= $1,188
c. Now the maximum amount spend for all other debt is
For monthly mortgage
= $924 × 70%
= $646.8
And, for mortgage debt
= $1,188 × 70%
= $831.60
A credit limit<span> is the maximum amount of credit that a financial institution or other lender will extend to a debtor for a particular line of credit (sometimes called a credit line, line of credit, or a tradeline).</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
