<span>This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the two parties on the idea. The null hypothesis would have shown that there is no difference in the two parties. Party affiliation, then, will likely be indicative of the level of a person's support for the concept of welfare reform.</span>
Answer:
The university's prohibition of students' efforts to use literature tables to recruit support for various causes
Explanation:
Answer: If this research is conducted between ages 13-70 years by random chance, the research result will be bias, because the tendency or probability of getting age 13-17 years kissing in public will be very low, because this age are still refered to as minor and may not have the boldness to kiss in public places. Also the tendency of getting age 50-70 years kissing in public places will be very low, because this age has grown old and the tendency or probability of their romantic life to be active at kissing in public places is very low. From age 18-40 years will be very much to seen if not all, and from age 41-49 will be a bit more. The conclusion of the research may be only for age 18-49 as it will be more easier to see this age kiss at public places. So for the researcher to use a research that more observation is see in age 18-49 years to draw conclusion for age 13-70 years, that's means he's conclusion will be bias because non or less observation is likely to be seen in age 13-17 and age 50-70 year.