The answer is d because he was a activist who fought for African american rights
How do we start the problem? What is it asking?
Yes that is correct (if that was a question)
The central ideas would be that the author has proved his point that no one in this world would be born and reached the top of a success without spending an enormous time of practice which would be -- 10,000 hours.... His other central idea would be that according to him, as the psychologists look at the careers of the gifted, innate talent plays a smaller role but rule preparation or practice plays a bigger role to succeed.
In the story of “Shooting an Elephant”, when the narrator views the body of the Burmese man who had been creased to death in a crucifix-styled posture, he has an overwhelming attack of conscience. The narrator realizes that just like the Burmese man, the elephant had been crucified, as well, and it does not appease the narrator that his killing the elephant was within legal parameters.The narrator apprehends that the law and conscience are often not well-matched. He is there in an official capability and is hated for it by the Burmese. He equally has hated them for their anger. Yet, when he allows his morality to surface, he understands that he is part of the structure that is there to tyrannize the Burmese. The fact that he holds a position of authority does not essentially make it a moral duty. This is true of his killing the elephant. He did not want to lose face in front of the Burmese, and he was legally justified in killing it, but morally he knows that it was actually morally wrong.
