<span>The
legal principal which Marbury stated was that he argued that Section 13
of the Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court authority to issue a
writ of mandamus under its original jurisdiction, its power to hear and
decide such a case for the first time. which was his hope of winning
the case.
</span>
Answer:
she would have to go to the hospital for treatment
A strict constructionist is a person who believes that the u.s. constitution should not be amended by judges and that judges should adhere closely to the document's text.
A strict constructionist is the one who believes that the wording of the Constitution is incomprehensible and that the words of the Constitution should be interpreted literally. This philosophy is usually associated with federal jurisdiction when it involves constitutional issues. A strict constructionist usually specifies to a judge who interprets the constitution exactly as it is written. Anyone can be a strict constructionist, but the term best applies to those with political power.
Know more about a strict constructionist here
brainly.com/question/13594866
#SPJ4
