Answer:
Visual/spatial Learner
Explanation:
People who fall under the classification of visual/spatial learners, absorb, perceive, analyze and understand VISUAL information around them, and capture concepts with what their eyes picture.
These kind of learners take information the best when is written, modeled or diagrammed, through a visual media. And have good hand-eye coordination, and memorization of details.
Jesse designs and plays with machines, thus most likely follows and draws diagrams, plays with logic puzzles that need analyzing with the eyes, and he has an ease with maps, so Jesse is more a visual person than an auditory for example.
Answer: False
Explanation: The statement in the question describes Stimulus Equivalence.
Contingency Adduction occurs when an individual acquires a new behaviour through conditioning and another contingency adds it to its own range of behaviors.
Stimulus equivalence on the other hand is when more than one different stimuli get the same response. Similar to the response in a situation where conditioning did not take place, although the response is accurate, it has not been reinforced.
They introduced the cash crops Also the huge plantations systems
According to <span>The Gospel of Wealth, every person has to get paid the same amount of money, whereas the idea of social Darwinism is that only the strongest will survive, so, I bet the way how </span><span>the gospel of wealth justifies social darwinism is that if everyone will get paid the same amount of money, the strong person won't be able to win as everyone would be alike (reminds of basic ideas of socialism).
Hope that helps!</span>
Answer:
"Soft Money"
Explanation:
"Soft money" is the name given to donations that are made to political candidates through a loophole created by the 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act. "Soft money" refers to money that is not given directly to a specific candidate (this is "hard money") but is instead given to parties and committees. There are no limits on "soft money," which has led to extensive criticism.
