1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mice21 [21]
3 years ago
14

Josiah strong and Albert beveridge agreed that expansionism was a natural part of American destiny. How did Strongs argument dif

fer slightly from that of Beveridge
History
1 answer:
jeka57 [31]3 years ago
3 0

While Minister Josiah Strong backed expansionism by claiming it was God's Will, Senator Alfred Beveridge justified it by stating that the emerging businesses demanded imperialism and it was America´s destiny to bring trade, liberty, and civilization to benighted people.  

Strong argued that it was America´s manifest destiny to acquire new lands in a race with the other nations to dominate the world and acquire the limited resources. Beveridge argued that the increased business abroad had made it necessary to protect investments overseas.

You might be interested in
How old must they be to serve?
kirill115 [55]
You must me 17 years of age to serve in the military
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which option most accurately summarizes the conflicting perspectives that erupted into the conflict known as “Bleeding Kansas”?
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Pro slavery advocates believed slave owners had a right to transport slaves into the territories; antislavery advocates argued that this gave slave holding settlers an unfair advantage over non-slave holding settlers.

Pro slavery advocates argued that the slave status of Kansas should be determined by popular vote; antislavery advocates argued that Kansas should be free because of its location north of the 36° 30' parallel.  

Pro slavery advocates contended that free African Americans in Kansas should not be permitted rights under the state constitution; antislavery advocates argued that the federal constitution took precedence over Kansas’s state constitution.

Pro slavery advocates held that slavery in the state was legal, as established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820; antislavery advocates argued that this legislation was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Dred Scott case.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELPPP
NeTakaya

I think answer choice D makes the most sense.

6 0
3 years ago
If a person living in West Africa was captured by a European slaver trader, what conditions would the person face?
AfilCa [17]
The correct answer for this question is "All answers are correct." If a person living in West Africa was captured by a European slaver trader, the conditions that would the person face includes terrible treatment with almost no hope of freedom, brutal work in bad conditions and <span>a life far from home</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Philadelphia was one of the first
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

Philadelphia was one of the first planned cities in the United States.

Explanation:

Source: Goog|e

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • For which 2 contries did vespucci sail to the western hemisphere
    12·1 answer
  • What was the term given to people who would not approve of the Treaty of Versailles unless it was amended?
    9·2 answers
  • Here is another one
    9·1 answer
  • Which statment about political action committee is true
    12·1 answer
  • By the late 1600s, settlers in the middle colonies were
    15·2 answers
  • Q What is the significance of amending the Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Help ASAP with saq will give brainlist
    8·1 answer
  • 100 Points. What was the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Marbury vs. Madison case?
    14·2 answers
  • 1 down deep narrow hole in the ground is used for protection
    11·1 answer
  • 7. What do the Hoover Dam and Lincoln Tunnels have in common?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!