False.
Whereas immigration is largely a federal issue, it is the
state courts that carry out most of the procedures of becoming a U.S citizen.
State courts have an effect on immigration in that they can affect it by
causing an increase in caseloads
Answer:
Explanation:
Originally the Spanish were the dominate factor in the New World. There they found gold (which led to the rest of the European nations to scramble for more land). Gold was one of the primary resources used by the Spanish to get wealthy.
The British, when not trying to steal gold from the Spanish, tried to establish their own colonies across large swaths of land in the New World in order to find similar resources such as gold. However, due to the lack of such resources on the Eastern Coast and Caribbean, to a large extent, a new resource had to be found. It soon became agriculture thanks to crops such as tobacco that became so popular in Europe.
France, on the other hand, was left with Canada and the wilderness surrounding the Mississippi River. Accepting the natives in trade, the French began to receive a very healthy trade of furs and other resources of the Native Americans.
This is typically highlighting the early days, these would come to change later in time. For example, England would later use their American colonies, the Caribbean, and their homeland in a trading triangle. They would use the natural resources like wood and such and send it to England to make the finished product. Also, the slave trade became a major part of it once parts of Africa
hope this helps
The Portuguese in 1517 became the first Europeans to arrive in China in the form of both formal embassy and trading pirates. They began direct trade in China by sea due to their improved marine technology in the 15th and 16th Century. They were the major exporters of Chinese blue and white wares throughout the 16th Century thus were the first Europeans to be influenced by these porcelains. The Portuguese established themselves as significant actors in the trade or exchange of goods between Asian countries and became involved in trade between China and Japan, therefore, earning money to purchase products needed in Europe.
I would say that B was the case ie Bush's prediction that Iraq's defeat would be quick and cheap was wrong. I believe that the US under Bush had no right to invade Iraq which was a sovereign country definitely with no weapons of mass destruction and its people had a high standard of living and women were much more emanicipated than in many other Arab countries like Saudi Arabia which the US is a staunch ally of. Also, it was gross hypocrisy when before the US had been an ally of Saddam Hussein during the war between Iraq and Iran and supplied him with arms.