1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PSYCHO15rus [73]
3 years ago
11

Although a nolo contendere plea may lead to a judicial determination of guilt, it is inadmissible in later civil cases against t

he defendant based on the same conduct amounting to the criminal violation.True or False.
Law
1 answer:
Orlov [11]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

This statement correctly identifies a characteristic of the <em>nolo contendere</em> plea. This is a legal term that expresses the desire to not contend. Therefore, this is also known as a plea of no contest. This is considered a plea in which the defendant neither admits nor disputes a charge. This may lead to a determination of guilt, but it is inadmissible in later civil cases against the defendant based on the same conduct amounting to the criminal violation.

You might be interested in
What English documents helped established the American Colonies system of Government and explain what was taken from each?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

American colonies, also called thirteen colonies or colonial America, the 13 British colonies that were established during the 17th and early 18th centuries in what is now a part of the eastern United States. The colonies grew both geographically along the Atlantic coast and westward and numerically to 13 from the time of their founding to the American Revolution (1775–81).

3 0
3 years ago
PLS Important, 2 questions
Mama L [17]

Answer:

3 basic rights.

1.Religious freedom

2. Freedom of speach

3. Freedom of the press

Explanation:

All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.

The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.

"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>

<em />

The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?  

The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the oldest branch of the military?
WINSTONCH [101]
The army
Hope it is correct!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following adjectives BEST describes an effectual, and true
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

Constitutionalism is a political movement and philosophy that states that the ruling power is bound to respect certain rights of its subjects. According to modern constitutionalism, the form of government must be based on a constitution.  

Constitutionalism includes both the empowerment and the limitation of power, both granting power and specifying its scope and purpose. Constitutionalism is considered to promote the principles of the rule of law, the principle of predictability, and to prevent arbitrary administration of justice. According to constitutionalism, laws and judgments in countries with common law can be declared invalid because they are contrary to the constitution if it is done in accordance with the principle of transparency, usually by a constitutional court or a court with similar jurisdiction.

6 0
3 years ago
In paragraph 14, the phrase "perfuming the air"
Bad White [126]

Answer:

I think it would be B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As a result of the chestnut blight epidemic___________. 1. all of the others 2. the Plant Quarantine Act was passed 3. the peopl
    9·1 answer
  • What is odontology , and explain how they do their job.
    7·1 answer
  • Emergence of federalism in Nigeria​
    14·1 answer
  • Which term describes a formal statement naming the plaintiff and the defendant and describing the nature of a civil lawsuit?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about criminal cases?
    12·1 answer
  • Please help word cross puzzle
    13·2 answers
  • Thankssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT an informal resolution during the intake process?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is it a good idea to physically prepare before you go into training to be a firefighter?
    11·1 answer
  • Jamahl and Nigel are college freshmen who run a computer bulletin board system. They decide to hack into the computer system of
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!