1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
11

Should the insanity defense be kept as is, changed in some way or abolished?

Law
2 answers:
Cloud [144]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i dont really understand

Explanation:

adell [148]3 years ago
3 0
Ans: “Guilty but mentally ill” laws should be abolished as they are unjust, ineffective, and misleading. States should provide individuals who are acquitted by reason of insanity with appropriate, recovery-oriented treatment, preparing them for life after civil commitment.
You might be interested in
What is the difference between public forum and private property?
tiny-mole [99]
A public forum is something like streets parks and sidewalks which are; open to the public, it is protected under the first amendment, a private property is something that is owned by a private owner so basically anyone who isn’t the state or government
7 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Winston pays a yearly fee to Barbara to rent stall space for his horse at the fairgrounds. Winston’s tenancy is best classified
GrogVix [38]
Answer is Periodic tenancy
4 0
2 years ago
True or false: All crimes that happen in the United States will be counted in either the UCR numbers or the NCVS numbers.
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

NOTall crimes have judgement but to mev the answer is true

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Puzzle: Murder case
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

it's the wife because if it was anyone else she would've heard them and called the police alot earlier

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why have some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches? What historical laws gave this right to states?
    6·1 answer
  • True or False? The elastic clause states that congress can pass all laws necessary and proper to carry out its duty.
    10·1 answer
  • Do arresting officers ever obtain incriminating statements from suspects ?
    9·1 answer
  • I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP AS IN RIGHT NOW!!!! Which of the following shows the most likely order that a case would
    14·2 answers
  • Tajinder wrote a letter to Amanpreet in which he stated I am planning to buy your car I can meet your price I will call you next
    12·1 answer
  • Buyer Carla feels like her broker discriminated against because of her religious beliefs. How long does Carla have following the
    10·1 answer
  • Points :)<br><br><br> lolllllllllllll
    11·2 answers
  • _______________ is the best solution to preventing intoxication.
    13·2 answers
  • Mid Semester Examir
    11·1 answer
  • ***50 POINTS+BRAINLIEST*** Number 8 <br> Question in picture below.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!