Answer:
creating a social atmosphere in which the law is a mechanism for controlling have-not members of society.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
<h2><em>Explanation:</em></h2><h2><em>Explanation:A stop-and-frisk refers to a brief non-intrusive police stop of a suspect. The Fourth Amendment requires that before stopping the suspect, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect. If the police reasonably suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect, meaning that the police will give a quick pat-down of the suspect's outer clothing. The frisk is also called a Terry Stop, derived from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Terry held that a stop-and-frisk must comply with the Fourth Amendment, meaning that the stop-and-frisk cannot be unreasonable. According to the Terry court, a reasonable stop-and-frisk is one "in which a reasonably prudent officer is warranted in the circumstances of a given case in believing that his safety or that of others is endangered, he may make a reasonable search for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerous." Stop-and-frisks fall under criminal law, as opposed to civil law.</em></h2><h2 />
Answer: The Answer is civil liberties
Explanation: Civil liberties are the rights guaranteed by the Bill of rights, they are protected by the amendments recognizing the citizens' natural rights. Civil liberties protects these rights from being violated by the government.
