D. cause you gotta isolate your variables (the cereal boxes) then get rid of the coefficent (2)
Answer:
50 points
Step-by-step explanation:
i looked it up, and the internet says 46 is 92% of 50.
also i like ur todoroki pfp
For a two column proof, we want to start with the given information. From there, we will use various definitions, postulates, and theorems to fill in the rest.
Our two sets of given information are that Plane <em>M </em>bisects Line <em>AB </em>and that Line <em>PA</em> is congruent to Line <em>PB</em>.
We know from the definition of a bisector that it splits a line in two equal parts. Therefore, Line <em>AO</em> must be congruent to Line <em>BO</em>.
Now, we have two sides of a triangle that we have proved to be congruent to each other. From the image given in the original problem, we see that both triangles share Line <em>OP. </em>Line <em>OP</em> is congruent to Line <em>OP</em> through the reflexive property.
We now have proven that all three sides of the one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides on the other triangle. Therefore, the triangles are congruent through the SSS theorem.
Answer:
The brother is likely wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
The range of the vehicle with a full tank is ...
(13.5 gal/tank)(25 mi/gal) = 337.5 mi/tank
You have 1/4 tank, so your range is ...
(337.5 mi/tank)(1/4 tank) = 84.375 mi
If you make the 85 mile distance, it will be because you achieved gas mileage better than average and/or your gas gauge gives you some cushion.
Unit analysis says you do not have the necessary range.
B
............................