Suppose in studying Climate Change we discover that in one country, deserts are going to be created where formerly there was grasslands and an abundance of water and in another place the coastlines are going to be altered. If you are an American, how do you think a politician is going to respond to such a problem.
Will his/her response be well thought out based on scientific preparedness, or will he (or she) grab onto the first solution suggestion to him/her and try and implement that?
Whatever he/she does, it will cost and everyone will be affected. A starting place is to find out what presidents in the past have done. During the Bush administration (the second Bush), there was an oil crisis. He responded by allocating more acreage to the growing of corn so supplementing oil production. Replaceable resources for non renewable ones. Sounded like a very good solution, but was it? As it turned out, no. He was robbing Peter to pay Paul. Thousands of people suffered (and died) with that decision because food is much more important than solving transportation problems at the expense of food.
The same is true here. If a solution is sought for global warming, politicians have to be well aware of what they are doing. And that has to be studied very carefully.
Answer:
-$2,350
Explanation:
In this question, we have to compare the cost which is shown below:
If we considered the reworked cost, then the sales would be
= Sales - reworked cost
= $55,700 - $1,750
= $53,950
And the scrap value is $56,300
So, the financial disadvantage would be
= Sales without reworked cost - scrap value
= $53,950 - $56,300
= -$2,350
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
The answer here is ‘aging’.
I hope this can help.
Answer:
a. Equity alliance
Explanation:
Equity alliance -
It is the process , in which one of the company take the equity stake of the other company and vice versa , is referred to as equity alliance .
Due to this , the company becomes shareholder and stakeholder of each other .
The share acquired is the minor one , so that the company still have the power of decision making .
Hence , same case is shown in the question ,where the Moon Star Products Inc.buys the 40 % of the stock of Gold Logistics .
