Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.
Ray is a shareholder of a small company. When the director falls to undertake an action it falls under derivative suit.
Explanation:
- Derivative suit is referred to as a law suit that is brought by the shareholder in behalf of the company against the third party.
- If in a company the employees, the directors as well as the officers are not ready to file a complain against the third party then the shareholder has the right to file a complaint against the third party.
- Derivative suit is normally filed by the shareholder when there is a mismanagement in the company. To stop the illegal work this action is being taken.
Answer:
3. net income is understated by $175
Explanation:
There were two transactions omitted. The first transaction is unearned rent revenue of which $450 was earned. This earned rent revenue increases income by $450. While the second transaction was accrued interest payable of which $275 is owed. This interest payable increases liabilities by $275.
Therefore, from the above, income or revenue is understated by $450, while expenses is understated by $275.
Therefore, net income is understated by income less expenses, thus 450 - 275 = $175. This also implies that liabilities are overstated by $175.
Answer:
Credit life Insurance
Explanation:
The scenario describes Credit life insurance
This is a form of insurance policy that that is designed to pay off the balance on a policy holder's outstanding loan in case of death. It is designed for the protection of lender and heirs who are co signers from loss in case of the death of the borrower.
The insurance is liable to the balance on the loan as at the time of the death of the borrower.
