The statement, the disciples successfully cast out a demon from a father's demon possessed son after several hours' effort, is false.
The disciples were never able to fully cast out the demon from a father's demon possessed son until Jesus came and helped. Before the disciples attempt to drive out a demon but they fail to do so, so after which Jesus comes to help.
The nine disciples, however, were very sure that they could drive out the evil spirit from the father's son. It was because they had an experience of driving out evil spirits during their fieldwork training time. Still they could not do so.
Hence, option B is correct.
To learn more about disciples here:
brainly.com/question/3089058
#SPJ4
The Southern colonies are the most suitable for growing crops. i remember this because they used slaves for crop production and the Southern colonies were known to have the most slaves.
Hope it helps. :)
Answer:
The Declaration summarized the colonists' motivations for seeking independence. By declaring themselves an independent nation, the American colonists were able to confirm an official alliance with the Government of France and obtain French assistance in the war against Great Britain.
hope this helped
please give brainlist
Answer:
Answer:
Human capital is the stock of habits, knowledge, social and personality attributes embodied in the ability to perform labour so as to produce economic value. Human capital is unique and differs from any other capital. It is needed for companies to achieve goals, develop and remain innovative. Companies can invest in human capital, for example, through education and training, enabling improved levels of quality and production.
Explanation:
pls make brailiest
Answer:
civil case
Explanation:
Diversity jurisdiction includes is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction whereby US district courts (e.g., trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judiciary) have the power to hear a <u>civil</u> case where the parties are "diverse" in citizenship, indicating that they are citizens of different states or non-U.S. citizens. A dispute between two individuals from two different states is an example of diversity jurisdiction. It is a method federal courts use to gain jurisdiction over a case involving individuals or entities from two different states.
