Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
Answer:
3. cannibalization
Explanation:
This term refers to the situation were sales or the market share of a product are reduced because another product is introduced by the same company.
Hello!! Me too, when I ask questions!
Answer:
1. Cash payments for merchandise is $446,030
2.Cash payment for operating expense is $77,870
Explanation:
1. In order to calculate the Cash payments for Merchandise we would have to use the following formula:
Cash payments for Merchandise= cost of goods sold +decrease in accounts payable-decrease in inventory
Cash payments for Merchandise=$448,500+$4,290-$6,760
Cash payment for Merchandise=$446,030
2. In order to calculate the Cash payments for operating expenses we would have to use the following formula:
Cash payment for operating expense=operating expense - decrease in prepaid expense +decrease in Accured
Cash payment for operating expense=$78,000 -$650+$520
Cash payment for operating expense=$77,870
