1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
agasfer [191]
3 years ago
11

I need help nowwwwwww please help

History
1 answer:
mr_godi [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I know for 1 it is either A or B

Explanation:

You might be interested in
list two reasons that the British soldiers might have believed they were justified when they fired on boston colonists
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

Explanation: Tensions ran high in Boston in early 1770. More than 2,000 British soldiers occupied the city of 16,000 colonists and tried to enforce Britain’s tax laws, like the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts. American colonists rebelled against the taxes they found repressive, rallying around the cry, “no taxation without representation.”

Skirmishes between colonists and soldiers—and between patriot colonists and colonists loyal to Britain (loyalists)—were increasingly common. To protest taxes, patriots often vandalized stores selling British goods and intimidated store merchants and their customers.

On February 22, a mob of patriots attacked a known loyalist’s store. Customs officer Ebenezer Richardson lived near the store and tried to break up the rock-pelting crowd by firing his gun through the window of his home. His gunfire struck and killed an 11-year-old boy named Christopher Seider and further enraged the patriots.everal days later, a fight broke out between local workers and British soldiers. It ended without serious bloodshed but helped set the stage for the bloody incident yet to come.

On the frigid, snowy evening of March 5, 1770, Private Hugh White was the only soldier guarding the King’s money stored inside the Custom House on King Street. It wasn’t long before angry colonists joined him and insulted him and threatened violence.

At some point, White fought back and struck a colonist with his bayonet. In retaliation, the colonists pelted him with snowballs, ice and stones. Bells started ringing throughout the town—usually a warning of fire—sending a mass of male colonists into the streets. As the assault on White continued, he eventually fell and called for reinforcements.

In response to White’s plea and fearing mass riots and the loss of the King’s money, Captain Thomas Preston arrived on the scene with several soldiers and took up a defensive position in front of the Custom House.

Worried that bloodshed was inevitable, some colonists reportedly pleaded with the soldiers to hold their fire as others dared them to shoot. Preston later reported a colonist told him the protestors planned to “carry off [White] from his post and probably murder him.”

The violence escalated, and the colonists struck the soldiers with clubs and sticks. Reports differ of exactly what happened next, but after someone supposedly said the word “fire,” a soldier fired his gun, although it’s unclear if the discharge was intentional.

5 0
3 years ago
What event sparked the end of america’s isolationist policy
Leni [432]
World war 2 sparked the end of america’s isolationist policy
8 0
3 years ago
the cartoon relates to the british policy of appeasement. In a one paragraph response, describe what is happening in the cartoon
Ahat [919]

Answer:

The cartoon is depicting a little kid on a small island handing out candy to these "monster-like" creatures surrounding him. This represents the island nation of Great Britain as the kid and Nazi Germany as the monsters. The act of Great Britain giving out "candy" represents Britain agreeing with Germany to claim territories in Europe such as Austria, Memel, Sudetenland, etc. Sudetenland was especially a big sign of appeasement after the Munich Conference which Czechoslovakia did not attend.

3 0
3 years ago
1. When Frederick Douglass stated,
Alik [6]

Answer:

He meant that the act was made to increase the power of slave states.

Explanation:

He made that statement when he's commenting about the Fugitive slave act of 1850. This act was made to made sure slaves that escaped  the free states to be returned to the owners.

Douglass believed that this act was a conspiracy that made by legislators from Sothern states to expand the power of the slave states.

Mason & Dixon lines were the lines that separated the slaves states and free states region. Douglass believed that the fugitive slave act of 1850 made this line basically obsolete. The free states wouldn't be able to provide protection to African American like they intended to.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a characteristic of a nation-state
AysviL [449]
D is the answer thanks

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did industrialization in russia lead to unrest?
    5·1 answer
  • All of the following were goals that Lincoln hoped to accomplish by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation EXCEPT which one? A. H
    13·1 answer
  • In june 2005, "deep throat," the celebrated whistleblower in the watergate affair, was identified as:
    6·1 answer
  • How did seas help protect Ancient Rome?
    13·1 answer
  • In In 1958, the AARP was organized to promote _____.
    14·2 answers
  • What impact did the introduction of smallpox have on the growth of African slavery
    11·1 answer
  • Which progressive reform did the people of galveston undertake after the hurricane of 1900
    9·1 answer
  • Which action would most likely help group discussion participants work toward discussion goals?
    9·1 answer
  • In which step in the legislative process does the House debate on the bill?
    15·1 answer
  • Which group was mostly responsible for raiding villages for potential slaves?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!