1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
10

What was the effect of the Indian removal act of 1830

History
1 answer:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:it forced Native Americans from the areas where they had lived for hundreds of years

Explanation:just answered it on my quiz and it was correct

You might be interested in
What was a important fuel and metal ancient Chinese discovered that support today's technology?
Minchanka [31]

Answer:

The answer should be D. Sorry if incorrect. Hope this helps.

6 0
3 years ago
Should the United States have helped Germany recover from world war 2
Doss [256]

the U.S. should not have helped Germany recover from war.

6 0
4 years ago
Which phrase best completes the diagram?​
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

B.) became dictator of rome

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between good that is a want?
DochEvi [55]

Answer:

Need - More important than want because it can become something you need to live and breath.

Want - You just want something for no reason or it doesn't have a better reason than what you need.

Explanation:

Example

Need - I need water or I will die.

Want - I want a 40 in tv to play Fortnite on a bigger screen.

Want

Its like asking your mom "can I have a lollipop because it looks good" and she says no because you don't need it.

Need

Its like asking your mom "can I have socks or underwear because they don't fit or there broken" and she says "yes because you need em obviously or your nasty.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which line from the text provides evidence that the author is comparing and contrasting the ideas of Plato and Aristotle?
    9·2 answers
  • Question 10 of 10
    14·1 answer
  • What do Homer’s epics reveal about Greek culture?
    12·2 answers
  • What did the populist party argue for? A. They wanted the rich to pay more taxes. B. They wanted the government to stay out of b
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Summarize the different ways U.S. citizens can become involved in the political process and explain
    9·1 answer
  • What is the last word of the Declaration of Independence
    10·2 answers
  • 1.A significant impact of the economic specialization that occurred as a result of the
    6·1 answer
  • Who spoke out against the government policy of confining Indians to reservations, adopting the language of freedom and equal rig
    10·1 answer
  • .Jacksonian democracy promoted
    6·2 answers
  • Complete the diagram by identifying your specific status and roles. My Status Set My Topic Roles Set​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!