1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marrrta [24]
3 years ago
7

ATTENTION: Give explanations to each questions please.

History
1 answer:
Furkat [3]3 years ago
8 0
One thing that can help is that the US government pretty much screwed the Native americans so anything stating good is most likely the wrong answer 

1 
a. indian removal act it gave the government reason to force the cherokee and other tribes west of the Mississippi since they thought they could with the act.

2
a. some of the Cherokee signed the treaty with the government without approval of all the tribal elders 

3
c it was jackson who used the indian removal act as justification of moving natives west in the first place and trail of tears occurred after he had already forcefully removed the natives. and overall most presidents wouldnt openly support killing innocent people even if they dont like them.

You might be interested in
How did F. W. de Klerk influence change in South Africa?
____ [38]

Answer:

he and the government dismantled the apartheid system and introduced suffrage.

Explanation:

i hope this helps i think its right

4 0
2 years ago
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
United States became involved in the Iraq War because: (1 point)
Lorico [155]
A. Iraq was responsible for the terrorist attacks of September 11,2001
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were germanys gains and losses during war?
boyakko [2]
Before Gettysburg, most major Civil War battles in the East 
were won by the Union military.involved General Robert E. Lee.were fought on Confederate soil.<span>involved General Ulysses S. Grant.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which of these was a negative effect of the Colombian exchange?
o-na [289]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Disease can't be good for anyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What titanic sank there enough lifeboats for everyone on that flight?
    11·1 answer
  • What caused the October 1929 stock market crash?
    14·2 answers
  • Under the articles of confederation each state got how many votes
    15·1 answer
  •  Write a letter, as a british government official during the industrial revolution, to an official in a nonindustrial nation ex
    6·2 answers
  • What continent did the Native Americans travel from to get to America?
    8·2 answers
  • Choose all that apply.<br> As a result of the Agricultural Revolution:
    7·1 answer
  • During the colonial era, South African society became divided based on
    9·2 answers
  • In the legislative assembly, radicals wanted to...?
    10·1 answer
  • My friends . . . circumstances render it impossible that you can flourish in the midst of a civilized community. You have but on
    5·1 answer
  • Х Which of the following helped spread ideas during the Renaissance?​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!