The answer in this question is the foot-in-the-door phenomenon which is the first one in the choices. The results of this experiment that the researchers conducted support the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. The foot-in-the-door phenomenon is one that is supported by the result of this experiment.
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
<span>production coefficients.
factors of production.
production technologies.
production aggregates.</span>
Answer: $25 billion
Explanation:
The increase in cash as a result of a deposit into the banking system, no cash leakages and a required-reserve ratio is:
= Deposit into banking system * Money multiplier
Money multiplier = 1 / Required reserve ratio
= 1 / 20%
= 5
Checkable deposit increase:
= 5 billion * 5
= $25 billion
Answer:
The answer is marketing.
Explanation:
Marketing is commonly defined as efforts to buy, advertise, distribute, and sell a product or service.
It is clear from the description in the question that Daniel works in the department since he is responsible to market Striking Apparel’s new products based on the target shoppers through social media and email marketing efforts such as sending out promotional emails and messages.
