It is not binomial random variable , since the number of red cards is unknown in the deck of cards in the starting of experiment.
As given in the question,
Number of cards are unknown.
Number of red cards are unknown in the starting of experiment.
Number of times process done =10
For binomial random variable number of red cards should be known.
Therefore, it is not binomial random variable , since the number of red cards is unknown in the deck of cards in the starting of experiment.
Learn more about binomial random variable here
brainly.com/question/14282621
#SPJ4
Answer:
MN
Step-by-step explanation:
It would be the last one, to inform readers about a topic using facts and details.
Answer:
YES IT IS
Step-by-step explanation:
2-3 + 3.3
= -1 + 3.3
= -4.3
We learn that:
Rational number: rational number is the number that can be written as a/b (a and b would be intergers and b is not equal to 0). Rational number would be most of numbers we use in out life, except Square root and Pi number.
In this case, -4.3 can be write as -43/10
So YES it would be a rational number
Hope this helped :3
Answer:
A(t)= 18000(0.988)^t
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
Ryan bought a brand new car for $18,000
Its value depreciated at a rate of 1.2%
Let us use the compound expression
A= P(1-r)^t
substitute
A= 18000(1-0.012)^t
A(t)= 18000(0.988)^t
Hence the expression is A(t)= 18000(0.988)^t
