A hypothesis is a educated guess made about the predicted outcome of the experiment. They are made before starting the scientific experiment.
According to empirical research, in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
<u>Explanation</u>
A <u>Moral hazard</u> is said to have occurred when one party (i.e insured Party) increases its exposure to risk ,because some other party bears the cost of those Risk.It reflects the tendency of a person to take more risk as the consequence of the risk taken has to be beard by some other party
<u>The moral hazard problem is </u><u>less </u><u> severe in bond markets than in stock markets. In addition, moral hazard arises in bond markets when firms issue bonds with high default risk.</u>
<u />
So it is appropriate to say that , in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
Based on the information given, the items that can be reflected in the account activity but that the person cannot account for include bank charges and transactions involving the use of ATMs.
From the complete information, it should be noted that there are bank charges that are charged by the banks. In this case, the account may not reflect the spending that has actually been done.
Also, there are taxes that are charged on the goods that the person bought. Therefore, this will be reflected on the account activity and will give rise to a higher value than the amount that the person actually spends.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25675366
Answer:
Jacko Inc Costo fo Capitak8.15%
Explanation:
From the gordon model for stock valuation
<em><u>we clear and solve for cost of equity </u></em>
D1 = D0(1+g)= 0.8 (1.08) = 0.0864
P 57.5
g 0.08
Ke 0.081502609 = 8.15%
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Strong emotions, especially violent or vengeful ones like anger, can cloud logical judgement and cause inappropriate outbursts. Writing an email while angry, especially in a professional environment, can have consequences and affect the receiver's impression of you. It is better to wait until the anger has subsided so you can explain why you may disagree politely, or choose the best course of action with a clear mind.
